BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
I am soooooo ANTI - ABC and I used to LOVE that channel. I watched so many programs... Now NONE!!!! We have even changed all the tv's to a different default channel. We don't want them to air for one single minute.
ABC excludes Obama's criticism of 'open borders' from televised portion of interview
ABC instead focus aired portion of Obama's border comments on his criticism of Republicans over immigration reform
ABC News left out a remark from former President Barack Obama describing "open borders" as "unsustainable" from the televised portion of his interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."
"Immigration
is tough. It always has been because, on the one hand, I think we are
naturally a people that wants to help others. And we see tragedy and
hardship and families that are desperately trying to get here so that
their kids are safe, and they're in some cases fleeing violence or
catastrophe," Obama told co-host Robin Roberts in the excluded portion
on Tuesday.
"At the same time, we're a nation state. We have
borders. The idea that we can just have open borders is something that
... as a practical matter, is unsustainable," he added.
Fox News Channel's Jacqui Heinrich noted the omission on Tuesday for a segment on "Special Report" with Bret Baier.
ABC
did air a portion where Obama blamed Republicans for the failure of
comprehensive immigration reform to pass Congress, and highlighted his
administration's approval of temporary legal status given to Haitian migrants following the devastating 2010 earthquake there.
"ABC
World News Tonight" also excluded Obama's "open border" remarks in its
coverage, instead spending less than a minute discussing the interview
and focusing on the groundbreaking of the Obama Presidential Library in
Chicago.
ABC included Obama's full comments in the online article about his interview, although they weren't mentioned until the 13th paragraph.
Obama's
admission that the crisis at the southern border, which is seeing
record numbers of migrants attempting to cross it, amounted to "open
borders" ran in stark contrast to the Biden administration's messaging surrounding the deteriorating situation, as well as its insistence that the border was "closed."
The
Biden administration came under intense scrutiny last week after the
clearing of an encampment consisting of up to 17,000 Haitian migrants at
the border led to thousands being released into the U.S., with court dates scheduled months later.
According to the U.S. Border Patrol, encounters at the border are up more than 500% in 2021, with over 200,000 migrants encountered in the month of August alone.
Vaccinated Michigan couple die minutes apart from COVID-19 while holding hands
Misty Severi
A vaccinated Michigan couple died less than a minute apart Monday from a breakthrough case of COVID-19. The two were holding hands when they died.
Cal
Dunham, 59, and Linda Dunham, 66, started to feel sick during a family
camping trip earlier this month but assumed it was a cold. Their
daughter, Sarah Dunham, said her father warned her that the couple was
not feeling well. The couple was hospitalized and placed on ventilators a
few days later, according to a local Fox station.
Doctors
told Dunham on Sunday there was not much else they could do, and the
couple would likely need to come off life-support the following day.
When it came time to disconnect the couple on Monday, Cal was wheeled
into Linda's room, and the couple was reunited. Fox-17 reported that
moments later, the couple held hands, and Cal died at 11:07 a.m. with
Linda right behind him at 11:08 a.m.
“[My father] called me before
our family camping trip and said he wasn’t feeling good, but he thinks
it’s just like sinus, and [Linda] caught it, and she’s like, 'He gave me
his cold,'” Dunham told the local outlet. “The third day, they woke me
up and said, ‘We’ve got to go because we don’t feel well.’ So I packed
them all up, and they left.”
“She always joked and said, ‘Well,
you’re going to go before I am. I’ll be right there behind you. I
promise,'" Dunham said of her mother. "She really was, like she really
was right there behind him.”
According to Dunham, the couple took
the virus seriously and were always cautious. However, both had
underlying health issues. Dunham said it was comforting to know that her
parents were together in both life and death. But her comfort turned to
anger at the people who were not taking the virus seriously.
“I’m
angry because so many people are like, ‘If I catch COVID, I catch
COVID. That’s what it is.' No, it’s not,” Dunham said. “It could be any
person. It could be anybody. They did everything right. They did
everything to protocol the way it should be done.”
According to the New York Times, 22,227 people in Michigan have died from COVID-19, and 690,558 people have died in the United States.
Suspected vandal Roy Lee Gordon Jr., an-ex Emory University employee and black man, has been arrested for allegedly spraying racist graffiti at his workplace.
In what appears to be another incident in a string of hate hoaxes in
the past several months, the former part-time Emory staff member is
accused of vandalizing the university’s Autism Center with racist and
antisemitic graffiti in early August.
According to the Daily Wire, racial
slurs were written near the workspace occupied by two African-American
women. There was also a swastika painted near the office of a Jewish
individual. In addition, a glass door had been ruined and nearby vending
machines were damaged.
(Bunch of NUTS... DO NOT allow them to ruin your life)
She Bought Her Dream Home. Then a 'Sovereign Citizen' Changed the Locks.
Sarah Maslin Nir
Shanetta
Little at her home in Newark, N.J., on Sunday, July 11, 2021. Little
was startled one day to find that the locks on her new home in Newark
had been changed by a man who claimed he was the rightful owner. (Bryan
Anselm/The New York Times)
The
official-looking letters started arriving soon after Shanetta Little
bought the cute Tudor house on Ivy Street in Newark, New Jersey. Bearing
a golden seal, in aureate legalistic language, the documents claimed
that an obscure 18th-century treaty gave the sender rights to claim her
new house as his own.
She dismissed the letters as a hoax.
And
so it was with surprise that Little found herself in her yard on Ivy
Street on a June afternoon as a police SWAT team negotiated with a man
who had broken in, changed her locks and hung a red-and-green flag in
its window. He claimed he was a sovereign citizen of a country that does
not exist and for whom the laws of the United States do not apply.
Little
was a victim of a ploy known as paper terrorism, a favorite tactic of
an extremist group that is one of the fastest growing, according to
government experts and watchdog organizations. Known as the Moorish
sovereign citizen movement, and loosely based around a theory that Black
people are foreign citizens bound only by arcane legal systems, it
encourages followers to violate existent laws in the name of
empowerment. Experts say it lures marginalized people to its ranks with
the false promise that they are above the law.
The man who entered
her house, Hubert John of Los Angeles, was arrested June 17 and charged
with criminal mischief, burglary, criminal trespass and making
terroristic threats. Prosecutors in New Jersey are preparing to take the
case before a grand jury, according to Katherine Carter, a spokeswoman
for the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office. He was released on his own
recognizance.
But the strange letters declaring that Little’s home
is not her own still come. They arrive on faux-consular letterhead
using the name Lenapehoking of the Al Moroccan Empire at New Jersey
State Republic. Lenapehoking was the land between New York City and
Philadelphia that includes New Jersey and was home to the Indigenous
Lenape tribe before it was colonized by European settlers. John and his
group refer to themselves as Moors.
“The Moors claim to be about
Black liberation and opportunity, and uplifting Black people,” Little
said in an interview. “But he is literally oppressing me and taking
what’s mine as a Black woman.”
This past summer, the Moorish
movement exploded into public view, after Little posted viral TikTok
accounts of her ordeal and when the police pulled over members of a
militant offshoot of the group on a Massachusetts highway. That
subgroup, known as Rise of the Moors, engaged in a standoff with the
police for more than nine hours, claiming that because they were
sovereign citizens, law enforcement had no authority to stop them. No
one was injured; 11 people were arrested and charged with unlawful
possession of firearms and ammunition, among other offenses.
Increasingly,
across the country, sovereign citizens have clashed with authorities,
tied up resources and frazzled lives in their insistence that laws such
as the requirements to pay taxes, obey speed limits and even obtain,
say, a license for a pet dog do not apply to them.
People who
claim to be Moorish sovereign citizens believe they are bound mainly by
maritime law, not the law of the places where they live, said Mellie
Ligon, a lawyer and author of a study of their impact on the judicial
system in the Emory International Law Review.
Initially espoused
by white supremacist groups, sovereign citizen ideology first cropped up
in America in the 1970s, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The Moorish permutation appears to have picked up in popularity in the
1990s, inspired in part by Black identity ideology of a similarly named
religious group, the Moorish Science Temple of America, which disavows
the sovereign citizen movement.
Membership in the Moorish
sovereign citizen movement has been driven by the internet into the
hundreds of thousands, the law center said. On its website, Rise of the
Moors, for example, has cited reparations — part of national
conversations about race and equity — as a driving factor for its belief
that its members can claim things as their own.
Rise of the Moors, as well as the members arrested in Massachusetts in July, did not respond to requests to comment.
Like
many Moorish followers, John adopted an Arabic-influenced name, Jaleel
Hu-El. He did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Via an
email, a staff member at the Al Moroccan consulate, where John is listed
on the website as the consul general to the United States and China,
initially scheduled an interview but then canceled.
The events of
June 17 are a distinct departure from John’s public persona: Dressed in
sharp suits and often wearing a red fez, John is a self-styled fashion
mogul. In a podcast interview, he said he spent nine years in banking
before buying a one-way ticket to China in the wake of the 2008
financial crisis.
There, John said, he was scouted by a modeling
agent. He became fluent in Chinese and produced several fashion shows
focusing on Black designers and models, according to multiple accounts.
How
he changed from dapper entrepreneur to a Moorish national confronted by
a New Jersey SWAT team is opaque. Around 2018, the social media
accounts associated with Black X, his business association, changed
tone, with posts about how to obtain Moorish license plates and identity
cards, and explainers of abstruse legal tactics.
Why John set his
sights on Little’s house is unknown. They don’t know each other,
according to Little, who says they have never met before she found him
in her home.
In documents that John posted online, he refers to
Little’s house, which was built in the 1950s, as his “ancestral estate,”
but according to the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, there does not
appear to be a connection.
On June 16, Little came to inspect her
dream home. She had closed on it in February and was planning
renovations before moving in.
Buying the home felt like a triumph
for Little, who grew up mostly in Florida as a foster child, finding
security as a teenager only when her high school principal took her in.
She graduated from the University of Central Florida but struggled as a
young adult, living out of motel rooms for periods of time. Now a senior
customer service specialist with Jaguar Land Rover North America, she
could afford to buy a house.
She tried to unlock the door but was
puzzled: the locks had been replaced. The next day, she returned with a
locksmith and was confronted by two men, one of whom was John and who
said the house was his. After a heated exchange she called the police.
When
the police arrived, both Little and John showed documents claiming the
house was theirs, according to a report by Brian O’Hara, Newark's public
safety director. Little shared the property deed proving ownership, she
said; he showed the fabricated papers bearing the Al Moroccan seal.
The
men “claimed to be sovereign citizens of the Al Moroccan Empire and
that their status permitted them access to the property,” O’Hara’s
report said. The officers verified that Little bought the house in
February, and they asked the men to leave. They did.
Thirty
minutes later, John returned, brushed past Little on the porch, she
said, opened the door with his own key and locked it behind him.
When she called the police a second time, they returned with a SWAT team.
Little
is still shaken, enraged each time an ominous letter arrives in the
mail. “He feels entitled that something I basically worked my whole life
for, something I was deprived of my whole life, especially as a kid not
having a safe space to call home,” Little said. “I deserve it, not
because of ‘ancestral lands’ or some scam trying to be pulled. I deserve
it because I earned it.”
For decades, followers of the Moorish
sovereign movement have remained largely off the radar, cropping up
mostly in outlandish-seeming news stories on their paper-terrorism
tactics.
But across the country, they have clogged court dockets
with those arguments, filing spurious lawsuits and burying county clerk
offices in flurries of fake deeds, liens and other documents. Police
departments nationwide have begun training officers on how to deal with
people who drive without licenses or with fake plates and who claim the
police have no authority over them.
When Jordan Fainberg, a real
estate agent in Bethesda, Maryland, visited a mansion he was selling for
its owner in 2013, he was startled to find inside a man named Lamont
Butler who said he was the real owner, with paperwork that referenced
the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and a peace treaty from the
1700s between the sultan of Morocco and the United States. Butler was
arrested and convicted of several crimes. He could not be reached for
comment.
“It was the most bizarre thing in the world,” Fainberg
said recently. “This was just somebody saying the sky is purple when
it’s blue.”
In Montgomery Circuit Court, Butler continued to claim
his rights as a Moor. Judge Terrence McGann did not agree: “Under your
set of rules, every house is fair game, you own the entire United
States, you own the oceans, you own anything you want,” he said,
according to reports. “And that’s not how a free, orderly society
works.”
If an election were held today, a substantial number of those who
voted President Joe Biden in November wouldn’t do so now, a new
I&I/TIPP Poll shows. This comes after a spate of recent polls from
TIPP and others suggesting Biden’s political support is in a freefall as
Americans question his leadership on issues ranging from COVID-19 to
the chaos on the U.S.’ southern border to the recent botched withdrawal
from Afghanistan.
The I&I/TIPP Poll asked Americans: “If the presidential
election were held today, and the following were the candidates, for
whom would you vote?”
Respondents were given the following choices: “Donald Trump, the
Republican,” “Joe Biden, the Democrat,” “Other,” “Not sure,” and “Prefer
not to answer.”
Just 46% of those who voted in the November 2020 election said
they’d vote for Biden today, more than five full percentage points below
his official total 51.3% share in the 2020 presidential election.
That doesn’t mean voters are wishing they’d instead picked Trump,
who in recent weeks has hinted at a possible re-run in 2024. The poll
found 42% said they’d pick Trump now, down from his actual 2020 election
total of 46.9%…
Also interesting is where Biden lost the most support – among
women, suburbanites, moderates, and the middle-class. In other words,
the key groups that helped put him in the White House.
The questions that remain now are, whether Biden will even
finish his first term and if he does, will he try to run again in 2024?
New Study Shows 1
in 1000 Develop Heart Inflammation After Covid Vaccination; Myocarditis
and Other Related Heart Conditions Have Increased Death Rate Within 5
Years
A shocking new study that was conducted by researchers at Canada’s University of Ottawa Heart Institute found that one
out of every thousand(1/1000) mRNA Covid-19 vaccinations causes heart
inflammation(myopericarditis) to develop rapidly in otherwise healthy
individuals.
The study looked at over 32,000 individuals who had received either
the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines and monitored them for
heart-related conditions between June 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021.
32 of the study subjects were admitted into the hospital with heart and chest-related symptoms.
“There were 15,997 doses of Moderna vaccine, and 16,382 doses of
Pfizer vaccine administered over the study period, for a total of 32,379
doses. Note that these numbers represent a mixture of first and second
doses.
Therefore, if our cohort captured all cases
in the Ottawa area, then the incidence of myocarditis would be 0.1% of
all vaccine doses (32 cases/32,379 doses x 100), or 10 cases of
myocarditis for every 10,000 doses of vaccine.”
Researchers found that the symptoms show up extremely quickly after
vaccination, usually after the patient’s second dose. On average, people
who were affected developed the condition after just 1.5 days.
They also found that men are at a much greater risk than women – only 2 women experienced heart inflammation.
“32 patients were identified over the period of interest.
Eighteen patients were diagnosed with myocarditis; 12 with
myopericarditis; and 2 with pericarditis alone.
The median age was 33 years (18-65 years). The sex ratio was 2 females to 29 males.
In 5 cases, symptoms developed after only a single dose
of mRNA vaccine. In 27 patients, symptoms developed after their second
dose of. Median time between vaccine dose and symptoms was 1.5 days
(1-26 days).”
People who took the Moderna jab were 3x more likely to develop symptoms than those who took the Pfizer shot.
To date, this has been the largest case study that has looked at the
correlation between Covid mRNA vaccines and myocarditis symptoms within a
month of vaccination.
If the results are true, it would actually be more of a risk
for anyone under 65 to receive the shot than it would be to contract the
virus and recover, especially depending on how young they are.
Myocarditis and pericarditis both come with an extremely poor prognosis
and end up killing over 50% within 3-10 years of their diagnosis.
According to the most recent data, Americans under 65 have about a 1 in 1863 (Population – 273,820,000 / Total Covid deaths
– 146,991) or .00054 chance of dying from Covid-19 or .054%. If you
lower the age to 50 and under, the chance that Covid is fatal drops
precipitously to .00017 or 1 in 5841 or .o17%.
In other words, the chances that covid will kill you if you
are under 50 are almost 6x lower than the chances you will develop a
debilitating (and often fatal in the long run) heart condition.
Even more shocking – people under 40 who take the jab are
almost 13.5 times more likely to develop some form of myocarditis or
pericarditis than to be killed by Covid. Keep in mind the median age from this study was 33.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden and the tyrannical health regime double down on
their goal to get “every American” vaccinated by cramming down a new
dictatorial federal mandate with a third experimental ‘booster’ jab
being prepared for a massive rollout.
The Covid-19 vaccine has been so ‘effective’ in ‘protecting’ people
that the masses will now be pressured into taking another dose as new
outbreaks of the virus have forced a new wave of authoritarian
restrictions.
Advertisement - story continues below
Every single American has known for months where to go and how to get a vaccine if they wanted one. In fact, over 181 million eligible
citizens have been fully vaccinated in the US – If the virus was as
deadly as they are making it out to be, they wouldn’t have to mandate
people to take the vaccine; and on the other end, if the vaccines
provided the protection they’re supposed to provide, the vaccinated
wouldn’t be calling people killers because they are refusing to ‘protect
others.’
Besides, according to available data, a third
of the entire US population had contracted Covid BY THE END OF 2020.
Natural immunity has always proven to be superior to vaccines.
A recent study that was conducted in Israel on 800,000 individuals
confirms that is especially the case with the rushed mRNA Covid
vaccines.
They found that individuals who had received both doses of
the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were 13x more likely to contract Covid-19
than those who had natural immunity – Fully vaccinated people were also
found to be at a “GREATER RISK OF HOSPITALIZATION.”
If 1/3rd of Americans had already
contracted the virus – before it had even been known for a full year –
then why would “everyone” be forced to take the experimental vaccine?
Exactly what sCiEnCe is being followed with these vaccine mandates and passports?
In
media news today, the media peddles a narrative that horseback Border
Patrol agents were using whips on Haitian migrants, Jen Psaki gets
hammered for citing Biden's history with grief while discussing errant
Afghanistan drone strike, and the media frets over too many white Emmy
winners
Petito’s
case has captured the country since she went missing earlier this
month. Authorities found a body Sunday in Wyoming’s Grand Teton National
Park believed to be the missing young woman, while the current
whereabouts of Laundrie, who has been named a person of interest in the
case, remain unknown. The discovered body will undergo an autopsy
Tuesday.
Laundrie's family members were instructed by their
attorney not to talk to the authorities, which Lemon chalked up to
"privilege."
"You ask any person of color, you ask a Black man who – if they have that sort of privilege," Lemon said Monday night.
"It's
not privilege, it's a right," CNN's Chris Cuomo said, pushing back. He
added that any defense attorney would advise their client not to talk to
the police because they can use whatever they say against them.
Lemon
argued that while cops are the good guys in many cases, they "aren't"
in many more instances. He painted a picture of what he believed often
transpired behind closed doors when police take Black people and poor
people into custody, as many, he said aren't able to afford a lawyer.
"Do
you think like someone who, a Don Lemon, if I wasn't who I am, they'd
be like, ‘Hey, get your butt in here! What do you know about the
disappearance of such and such? Why won’t you talk? Do you need a lawyer
because you're guilty?' All of that would go down," Lemon said of the
police's behavior.
MSNBC's Joy Reid also evoked race in her analysis of Petito's disappearance, referring Monday to the media coverage of her case as "Missing White woman syndrome."
"It
goes without saying that no family should ever have to endure that kind
of pain. And the Petito family certainly deserves answers and justice,"
Reid said on "The ReidOut" Monday night. "But the way this story has
captivated the nation has many wondering, why not the same media
attention when people of color go missing?"
Lemon
raised a similar point, noting to viewers that while he is out in New
York City, several people, most of whom were White, have asked him why
the networks were spending so much time covering a missing White girl
and not other missing young women. The anchor said critics were wrong to
accuse him of making the case about race.
"People are talking to
me about this as it relates to race," Lemon said. "They've spoken to
Chris about it. You see it online. Don't pretend that I'm turning this
into something that it's not."
Talking like that... makes people NOT care about people making STUPID comments like YOU!!!
How many would look for you after making such a nasty comment like that?
Rude witch! These people lost their daughter... how dare you, how freaking dare you!
African Americans are made to look bad by jerks like above. Don't judge them all like her, I'm sure they are cringing reading those words. That poor family is grieving and this witch says something so ridiculous and unkind. What if this was YOUR family grieving?
"Well,
the answer actually has a name: Missing White woman syndrome. The term
coined by the late and great Gwen Iffil to describe the media and public
fascination with missing White women like Laci Peterson or Natalee
Holloway, while ignoring cases involving missing people of color," she
added, referencing two well-known cases of missing women.
MSNBC
has extensively covered the case and its website Monday morning
prominently featured an opinion piece on the missing woman.
Reid
spent the remainder of the segment discussing multiple instances of
missing Black and Native American individuals she claimed to have never
heard about in the same way as the Petito case.
She
also cited statistics from the Black and Missing Foundation that
suggested the disparity in media coverage between missing White women
and non-White women was attributed to missing minorities often being
classified as runaways, minority adults being labeled as associated with
crime, and that minorities are dismissed because it's believed they
live most of their lives with poverty and crime as a regular part of
their lives.
Reid ended the segment by suggesting that missing
women of color weren't noticed as much because they didn't look like the
daughters or granddaughters of newsroom executives, alluding to one of
her guest's earlier claims on the show that stories on missing non-White
women weren't sensational enough for the White, middle-aged males
leading newsrooms.
A COVID-19 booster shot that could protect against multiple variants at once is being tested in humans for the first time
Dr. Catherine Schuster-Bruce
·2 min read
A
person receives the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at the East Boston
Neighborhood Health Center (EBNHC) in Boston, Massachusetts on December
24, 2020. Joseph Prezioso / AFP via Getty Images
A COVID-19 booster shot that may protect against multiple variants is being tested in humans.
It uses new vaccine technology that self-replicates once injected in the muscle.
The vaccine may need a lower dose than existing shots, potentially reducing side effects.
A COVID-19 booster vaccine that could protect against multiple virus variants at once is being tested in humans for the first time.
The vaccine, called GRT-R910, uses a new technology called self-amplifying messenger-ribonucleic acid (mRNA),
which replicates itself once injected into muscle. COVID-19 vaccines
from Pfizer and Moderna use mRNA, which teaches our body how to make a
protein that triggers an immune response, but it cannot self-replicate.
Self-amplifying
mRNA promises lower doses than existing vaccines, which means it's
potentially cheaper and has fewer side-effects, Insider previously reported.
The trial, which is sponsored by the US National Institute of Health, will eventually recruit 20 volunteers, all over the age of 60, the company said.
Gritstone, the US pharmaceutical company that developed GRT-R910, said in a press release on Monday
that the vaccine could boost the immune response of "first generation
COVID-19 vaccines" to a "wide array" of coronavirus variants.
Dr.
Andrew Allen, chief executive officer at Gritstone, said the immune
response could provide "more benefit than an additional dose of the same
vaccine."
Results of the trial are expected in early 2022, Gritstone said.
Andrew Ustianowski, honorary clinical chair at University of Manchester and study local lead investigator, said in a statement
that "we think GRT-R910 as a booster vaccination will elicit strong,
durable, and broad immune responses, which are likely to be critical in
maintaining protection of this vulnerable elderly population who are
particularly at risk of hospitalisation and death."
Andrew Clarke,
63, and his wife Helen Clarke, 64, were the first to receive GRT-R910
as part of an early stage trial at Manchester University NHS Foundation
Trust, UK, on Monday.
Self-amplifying mRNA could potentially be developed on hospital sites tailored for specific outbreaks, rather than in large centralized factories.
Professor Ian Bruce, chair at the Manchester COVID-19 Research Rapid Response Group, said in a statement that future studies will examine GRT-R910's efficacy in other-vulnerable populations.
The esteemed New England Journal of Medicine posted a
correction last week and now admits the COVID vaccine may not be safe
for pregnant women.
The study was updated after it found that 104 of 827 pregnant
participants experienced a spontaneous abortion after receiving the
COVID vaccine. That is roughly 1 of 8 pregnant women losing their baby
after getting the vaccine.
t the time of publication of preliminary findings in the Original
Article related to this editorial, the number of spontaneous abortions
was 104 and there was 1 stillbirth. However, no proportion could be
determined for the risk of spontaneous abortion among participants
vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation because follow-up information
was not yet available for the majority of those persons. The article has
now been updated. In the fifth paragraph of this editorial (page 2342),
the first sentence should have read, “Among 827 registry
participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced
spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth,” rather than, “…a
completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a spontaneous abortion
in 104 (12.6%) and in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%); these percentages are well
within the range expected as an outcome for this age group of persons
whose other underlying medical conditions are unknown.” In the same
paragraph, in the sentence beginning “Among live-born infants” (page
2343), the expression “were also consistent” should have read, “were
consistent.” In the seventh paragraph, beginning “Given that,” the first
sentence should have ended, “…limitations in their ability to draw
conclusions about spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, and other
potential rare neonatal outcomes,” rather than “…to draw conclusions
about congenital anomalies and other potential rare neonatal outcomes.”
The editorial is correct at NEJM.org.
On Friday an FDA advisory panel declined to endorse authorization the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for people aged 16 or older.
The panel voted 16-2 to reject extra doses of an experimental
vaccine, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials and
the potential risk of heart inflammation – especially among young men.
The FDA hearing prior to the decision was stunning. The hearing was 8
hours long and it included SHOCKING testimony from American doctors.
Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD told the FDA on Friday that
government does not have data to show the vaccine was more beneficial
than it is harmful for teenage boys.
Dr. Fraiman told the FDA panel he has NOT seen that those who show
vaccine hesitancy are uninformed. “That is not what I’ve seen… The
vaccine hesitant I’ve met in the ER are more aware of the vaccine
studies and more aware of their own COVID risks than the doctors do. For
example, many of my nurses refuse the COVID vaccine despite seeing more
COVID deaths and devastation than most people have.”
Dr. Fraiman went on to say he cannot assure a nurse associate who is
30 that the vaccines are safer than catching the virus is for a healthy
woman her age.
Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund was up next to testify before the FDA. Kirsch argued the vaccines kill more people than they save.
Kirsh pointed out that there patients were 71 times more likely to
suffer a heart attack after taking the vaccine than those taking other
vaccines. 20 died from the drug, 14 from the placebo.
Kirsh argued that the vaccine killed more people than saved lives.
Myocarditis affected 1 in 1,000 who took the vaccine.
Steve Kirsch also pointed out that early treatments are more
successful than boosters, noting that cases in Israel are at an all-time
high and cases in Uttar Pradesh, India where they administer Ivermectin, the cases are nearly non-existent today.
Roy Lee Gordon, Jr.
