Saturday, July 22, 2023

Harry and Meghan ‘asked to ride home on Air Force One’ after Elizabeth II’s funeral

 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/harry-meghan-asked-ride-home-202432533.html

 

 

 Prince Harry with Jill Biden in the crowd

 

 

Harry and Meghan ‘asked to ride home on Air Force One’ after Elizabeth II’s funeral

1.2k

The Sussexes at Queen Elizabeth II's funeral
The Duke and Duchess were already in the UK at the time of the late Queen's death - Paul Grover for The Telegraph

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex asked if they could fly back from Elizabeth II’s funeral with

on Air Force One, it has been alleged.

Sources close to the couple have not denied the claim.

The couple are said to have asked White House staff if they could join the US President and his wife on the journey home, but were swiftly rebuffed.

The alleged proposition raises the extraordinary prospect that the Duke and Duchess wanted to be photographed climbing the steps of the famous Boeing 747 to wave alongside the President and First Lady of the United States.

Jill and Joe Biden at the funeral of Elizabeth II
The Bidens were among hundreds of heads of state to attend the funeral - Geoff Pugh for The Telegraph

But sources with knowledge of the decision said there was little discussion about the request as it was generally agreed that it was a “non-starter”.

One told MailOnline: “It would have caused such a commotion. It would have strained relations with the Palace and the new King.”

The White House declined to comment on the claim. A spokesman for the Sussexes also declined to comment.

The Duke and Duchess were in the UK when Elizabeth II died on September 8 as they had flown over to carry out various charity engagements.

They stayed in the country for two weeks until the funeral but fraught family relations prompted dramas including a mistaken invitation to a state reception at Buckingham Palace, confusion over military uniforms and a dispute about when Prince Harry was told about his grandmother’s death.

The couple are thought to have returned home on the day after the funeral with their own private security team feeling more ostracised from the Royal family than ever.

The Duke and Duchess previously enjoyed a good working relationship with the Bidens and it was one they were keen to cultivate after stepping away from royal duties as they tried to establish themselves as powerful establishment figures in the US.

As such,

was invited to attend the 2022 Invictus Games in The Hague but that too was declined, The Telegraph has confirmed.

Prince Harry with Jill Biden in the crowd
Jill Biden attended the inaugural Invictus Games at London's Queen Elizabeth park in 2014 - Chris Jackson/Getty Images

British officials are understood to have conveyed to National Security Council staff in a “working level conversation” that they thought the idea would land badly with the palace.

Both Bidens attended the Invictus Games in Canada in 2017 and the First Lady attended the 2016 games in Florida.

She is said to have been keen to attend the 2022 event, not least as she runs her own Joining Forces Initiative and is a keen supporter of the military and their families.

A further attempt to ingratiate themselves with the Bidens saw the Duchess send a basket of lemons to the First Lady after interpreting a sartorial choice as a show of support.

The day after the Sussexes’ controversial Oprah Winfrey interview aired in March 2021, Jill Biden wore an Oscar de la Renta dress with a lemon pattern to the State Department’s International Women of Courage Awards.

It bore a striking resemblance to a dress that Meghan had worn for a Spotify event the previous month and was seen in some quarters as a message of solidarity with the Duchess after she had described her tortuous relationship with the Royal family.

The Duchess has made no secret of her political ambitions, having personally called US senators on their mobile phones to lobby for a change in the law on paid parental leave.

She said it was “critical in those first few weeks” to be together as a family and used a television interview to note that the US is “the only country in the entire world” that does not have such a policy, adding: “I will do everything I can to make sure we can implement that for people.”

 

No matter where you stand politically, what would happen if Trumps son was in the news as much as Hunter is ?

  

 

 

Do you HONESTLY think it would be handled like the Biden family?

 

If you said yes....please remove your blinders.

Hunter Biden’s Lawyer Pictured Smoking a Bong on His Pacific Palisades Balcony during a Visit by Hunter

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/hunter-bidens-lawyer-pictured-smoking-bong-his-pacific/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hunter Biden’s Lawyer Pictured Smoking a Bong on His Pacific Palisades Balcony during a Visit by Hunter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

......

I PROUDLY stand with Jason Aldean

 

 


Friday, July 21, 2023

New York City Agrees to Pay Violent BLM-Antifa Protesters $13 Million After 450 Businesses Were Damaged in the Riots

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/new-york-city-agrees-pay-violent-blm-antifa/

 

 

New York City Agrees to Pay Violent BLM-Antifa Protesters $13 Million After 450 Businesses Were Damaged in the Riots

 

Whoa...) Pfizer and Moderna Face Legal Action in Australia Over Alleged Failure to Obtain Necessary “Genetically Modified Organisms” Licenses in COVID-19 Vaccines

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/pfizer-moderna-face-legal-action-australia-alleged-genetically/

 

 

Pfizer and Moderna Face Legal Action in Australia Over Alleged Failure to Obtain Necessary “Genetically Modified Organisms” Licenses in COVID-19 Vaccines

A lawsuit was filed in Australia’s Federal Court on July 6, 2023, accusing pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna of dealing with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) without the requisite licenses. The court case, identified as Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Anor, marks a milestone in the ongoing global discourse around the safety of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

From the news release:

“To paraphrase a line about the devil:

.. the greatest trick Pfizer and Moderna ever pulled was to convince the world their products don’t enter the nucleus, and alter chromosomal DNA, forever

With a heavy heart I can now share with you the new legal proceedings we launched on 6 July, naming Pfizer and Moderna as the Defendants; our planet’s new IG Farbens producing a more subtle Zyklon B (said with respect to those affected by the latter).

The Letters of Demand we sent to Pfizer, Moderna, the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, and the TGA, contain an abundance of references referring to the long established science surrounding the real dangers these transfection products were always known to pose to humanity.”

The lawsuit led by Julian Gillespie LLB, B Juris, with instructing solicitor Katie Ashby-Koppens argue that the vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, including both monovalent and bivalent vaccines, are or contain GMOs, and “that they have failed to apply for the necessary licenses.”

Central to this argument is the assertion that the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) -modRNA and -modDNA complexes present in the vaccines fulfill the Australian legal definitions of a genetically modified organism, pursuant to the Gene Technology Act 2000 (GT Act).

“In a nutshell: the LNP-modRNA complexes produced by Pfizer and Moderna satisfy Australian legal definitions for being properly deemed Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMOs. Almost identical legal definitions are found in many other countries, including the EU. There are over four decades of science acknowledging how easily synthetic and natural RNA can integrate with genomic DNA.

The subsequent discovery by Kevin McKernan of grossly excessive synthetic DNA contamination in the vials of both companies only makes a very bad situation much worse, as that modDNA also satisfies the same legal definitions for being yet another form of GMO, while possessing superior traits for effectively undergoing genomic integration, and DNA disregulation.

In Australia it is a serious criminal offence to ‘deal’ with GMOs without a GMO licence first being granted by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.”

Both Pfizer and Moderna have been accused of a ‘willful blindness’ to the legislative requirements. The lawsuits accuse the companies of bypassing the necessary processes to seek a GMO license from the Australian Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) before pursuing provisional approval from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

AstraZeneca, another vaccine producer, is cited as a contrast, having properly sought a GMO License before seeking TGA approval for its COVID-19 vaccine.

“This constituted a gross and heinous failure by Australia’s Gene Technology Regulator, assisted by the Secretary of Health not pausing to ask whether these drugs were not always meant to be first regulated by the OGTR, prior to being possibly cleared to proceed to apply for provisional approval with the TGA.

This utter failure by GMO regulators occurred about the globe when the C19 drugs were hustled to the front of approval ques, where now thanks to their transparent failures we can thank them for ensuring the Human Genome has been irreparably poisoned.”


The lawsuit seeks an urgent injunction against Pfizer and Moderna to prevent any further ‘dealings’ with their products in Australia, which would effectively stop further vaccinations. Further to that, it also seeks to investigate what health officials and regulators knew about these products when they first came up for approval.

“If we can achieve that we can then start asking the real questions of what Brendan Murphy and his army of highly paid PhDs knew when Pfizer and Moderna first ‘came a knockin’, while also asking what Australia’s Gene Technology Regulator, Raj Buhla, was doing when these drug manufacturers turned up seeking approvals, where there has been two decades of established science showing these transfection products being perfectly suited for targeting and altering genomes. There is no room for pleas of ignorance; the actions of Murphy and Buhla amount to an intentional dereliction of duty rising to some form of criminal culpability.”

Further muddying the waters is the recent discovery by genomics expert Kevinn McKernan of extensive DNA cell-substrate contamination in both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines.


Read more from MAAT’S Method:

DNA Contamination

Compounding the above is the recent discovery by genomics expert Kevinn McKernan ofdangerously excessive DNA cell-substrate contamination. This discovery has now beenindependently verified by other internationally recognised laboratories using different vials, evidencing gross, pre-existing, and continuing global supply contamination by Pfizer and Moderna.

The synthetic DNA (modDNA) contamination is anywhere between 18-70 times above legal limits.


However, this contamination is much worse than contemplated by outdated regulations, as the modDNA is also encapsulated in LNPs, thus ensuring bio-distribution throughout human bodies, and transfection into cells of all major types of organs, including the brain, heart, ovaries, testes, liver, spleen, eyes, and unborn children.

For the purposes of the GT Act, this excessive contamination also fulfils the legal definitions for being correctly deemed Genetically Modified Organisms, and perhaps the worst type of GMO, as genomic integration with chromosomal DNA does not require reverse-transcription, and some of this modDNA (by Pfizer) has the opportunity of becoming ‘replication competent’ (self replicating) in certain persons known to be infected with SV40 related viruses.

Perversely, and as a strict matter of law, both Pfizer and Moderna were/are required to possess GMO Licences to ‘deal’ with their LNP-modDNA contamination in Australia, though any organisation responsible for such licensure (the OGTR in this instance) would never allow any product into their country that contains this form of GMO contamination. This form of GMO contamination alters the course of humanity, and what it means to be human.


By these proceedings the Applicant (Dr Julian Fidge) together with the legal team who discovered and created the proceedings (Julian Gillespie, Katie Ashby-Koppens and Peter Fam), now seek to present the above facts to the court.

In the event the court follows and accepts the evidence that the C-19 products contain GMOs, and as a consequence both Pfizer and Moderna are seen to be committing ongoing Serious Criminal Offences by dealing with GMOs in Australia without a licence, the court should find itself compelled to issue an Injunction under section 147 preventing Pfizer and Moderna from any further dealings in Australia, which outcome would also require the halt of any further use of the Pfizer and Moderna C-19 products in Australia.

To read and download files related to the lawsuit, click here.

 

Black shooter and 4 white victims and they call it a MYSTERY?)Georgia Community Holds Vigil For Mass Shooting Victims; Police Say Motive Behind Massacre Remains a Mystery

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/georgia-community-holds-vigil-mass-shooting-victims-police/

 

 IF the races were reversed..... It would be on every channel and in protests like crazy.

Get real..... smart people know.



Georgia Community Holds Vigil For Mass Shooting Victims; Police Say Motive Behind Massacre Remains a Mystery

Well, this story disappeared quickly.

41-year-old Andre Longmore fatally shot four people in a small city south of Atlanta Saturday morning.

The mass shooting took place in the Dogwood Lakes area of Hampton, Georgia around 10:45 am.

Police cornered and killed Longmore on Sunday.

Two police officers were injured in the shootout.

The victims were all shot dead within 10 minutes.

“Scott Leavitt, 67, and his wife, 68-year-old Shirley Leavitt, 65-year-old Steve Blizzard, and 66-year-old Ronald Jeffers all were residents of the same Dogwood Lakes neighborhood where suspected gunman Andre Longmore lived.” Fox 5 Atlanta reported.


Police still can’t figure out a motive for the mass shooting.

Neighbors in the community held a candle-lit vigil this week to mourn the victims.

“It could have been any one of us,” the victims’ neighbor Sharon Hayes said. “I’m having a hard time dealing with the fact that it’s my neighborhood my safe neighborhood that’s been disrupted like this.”

“I would say shocked. Shocked would be a major word for me,” another neighbor said.

More from Fox 5 Atlanta: