Tuesday, June 1, 2021

Denver BLM Leader And School Board Member Under Investigation On Multiple Sex Abuse Allegations, Including 62 High School DACA Students...(WOW 62?)

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/denver-blm-leader-school-board-member-investigation-multiple-sex-abuse-allegations-including-62-high-school-daca-students/

 

 

 

Denver BLM Leader And School Board Member Under Investigation On Multiple Sex Abuse Allegations, Including 62 High School DACA Students

 

Share to Gab Clouthub Share

A local Denver school board member, Black Lives Matter protest leader, and anti-gun activist is facing dozens of accusations of sex abuse, rape, harassment, and “inappropriate behavior” from a variety of community members, including 62 high school students and illegal aliens in the DACA program, at least one as young as 14. Tay Anderson is denying the allegations and hopes to continue his work on the school board and in activism, but more victims continue to come forward. He is now stepping aside from his duties while the investigation continues.

 Chalkbeat Colorado reports:

Denver school board member Tay Anderson said Sunday he would step back from “everyday board functions” until an outside firm hired by the school district completes an investigation into sexual assault allegations against him.

In a separate statement, the school board clarified that Anderson will still vote on key matters, including the selection of a new superintendent, which is set to happen June 3. A Denver Public Schools spokesperson said Anderson’s stepping back means Anderson will not attend school or district meetings with staff or students.

Anderson announced his decision two days after the school board announced it was aware of new allegations against him.

Anderson is under investigation by an outside firm hired by Denver Public Schools. The district launched the investigation after the civil rights group Black Lives Matter 5280 said in March that a woman came to them to report that Anderson had sexually assaulted her.

Separate from that accusation, former members of anti-gun violence group Never Again Colorado said that Anderson engaged in inappropriate behavior when he was the group’s president in 2018.

Then this week, Denver parent Mary-Katherine Brooks Fleming testified before a Colorado legislative committee that 62 young people, nearly all of them current Denver high school students, came to her starting in August seeking help and protection from a specific man “in a position of trust.” She said they had experienced abuse ranging from unwanted touching to violent rape.

Anderson has consistently denied all allegations against him. He said Sunday that he expects to be cleared and return to all his duties.

The Denver Post elaborates:

Denver Public Schools acknowledged Friday night that its board and the Denver Police Department are aware of new sexual assault allegations against school board member Tay Anderson after a woman testified this week before a legislative committee about a sexual predator within the school system who has targeted students.

On Tuesday, Mary-Katherine Brooks Fleming, a parent of three DPS students, told the state House Judiciary Committee there is “a sexual predator targeting DPS children” during her public testimony in support of a bill that would make it easier for victims to sue institutions who employ child sexual abusers.

Brooks Fleming told the committee 62 people had come to her for help regarding a single individual, but she did not name that person. Their experiences ranged from unwanted touching to “violent acts of rape,” she said. Sixty-one of them lacked documentation or were recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and the youngest was 14, she said.

“Those who came to my home didn’t have health insurance, couldn’t afford emergency rooms, and even if they could, they wanted to avoid mandatory reporters for fear that such an interaction could jeopardize their family,” Brooks Fleming said in her testimony. “It is horrifying to realize that someone had preyed on these children, knowing their silence was guaranteed.”

In a statement emailed to The Post on Friday night, the Denver Public Schools Board of Education stated, “The Board was made aware of testimony at the Colorado Capitol this week and was later informed that the accusations were against Director Tay Anderson. The Denver police are also aware of these accusations.”

 

The Denver Police Department’s investigators have spoken with Brooks Fleming about her comments, but they have not heard from any victims, Jay Casillas, a department spokesman, said in an email to The Post.

“If someone is a victim, we encourage them to contact Denver Police,” Casillas wrote.

Anderson, who has been under investigation by the school district for a single sexual assault allegation since early April, referred questions to his attorney, Christopher Decker. Decker denied the allegations on behalf of his client.

In a statement to The Denver Post, Decker wrote, “Nothing is worse or more unacceptable than the harm caused by sexual assault upon our children, or the related harm caused by not believing those who have been victimized in this way. This is also why false assertions of these horrible crimes act to cheapen and diminish its importance. It is because of these two truths that responsible people and organizations must carefully investigate such inflammatory claims completely, and with an open and fair process.”

Mary-Katherine Brooks Fleming’s posted her testimony on Twitter:

The Denver Post story continues:

Brooks Fleming, who is active in Denver’s social justice community and who has volunteered at Blue Bench, a nonprofit organization that aids sexual assault victims, previously had declined to name the person she was accusing to The Post.

 

Anderson has been under scrutiny for an alleged sexual assault since March 26 when Black Lives Matter 5280 published a public statement saying a woman came to the group in February to report that Anderson had sexually assaulted her. The statement said the woman wanted Anderson to issue a public apology and to seek help from a licensed professional.

In a news conference two days later with Decker at his side, Anderson denied the allegation, saying he was not aware of any situation that could be construed as sexual assault. He also welcomed any investigation into the accusation.

The Denver Public Schools board hired the Investigation Law Group, an outside firm, to investigate the situation. On May 18, the school board said the firm was conducting final interviews and was expected to produce its report within the next 30 days. However, Brooks Fleming’s testimony came after that announcement was made and on Friday the district said the investigation remains open.

Black Lives Matter 5280 released this statement regarding Anderson’s alleged abuse within their organization:

Anderson is attempting to play the victim, saying a web hacker has orchestrated all of this, as KDVR FOX 31 reports:

Anderson’s attorney, Chris Decker — who’s also a FOX31 legal analyst — said in a statement that no one has come forward with any more information about the allegations, including some brought forth in March, and that police have not contacted him, either.

Decker also said “a known racist criminal web hacker … claims (to me and others) to have orchestrated these false allegations against Director Anderson” — information he said has been reported to police.

“On behalf of Director Anderson, I ask only for a responsible and thorough investigation of these concerning matters and assure the public that if that is done, he will be cleared of any and all wrongdoing,” Decker said. “The only thing worse than sexual assault on children, or the denial or coverup of the same, is weaponizing false claims of sexual assault and irresponsibly publishing or concluding it has happened when it has not.”

Anderson released this generic statement via his Twitter page, but doesn’t address any of the accusations:

Anderson was apparently injured by police when protesting against a homeless camp clean up. He vowed that the “City of Denver, you fucked with the wrong person” while wearing his official school board name badge.

Oh but it gets better for Mr. Anderson! Back in 2018 he was found guilty of retaliation after someone came forward with another set of accusations of abuse. Westword reports:

But Anderson, 22, acknowledges that a May 2018 Denver Public Schools investigation found that he had engaged in retaliation while advocating on behalf of former Manual High School Principal Nick Dawkins, whom the district had investigated following employee complaints of harassment and bias. A Dawkins accuser tells Westword that retaliation took the form of social media posts aimed at her that began appearing the previous month. She viewed it as harassment of a person who’d made claims of harassment.

“In early 2018, I worked at Manual High School as a paraprofessional,” Anderson says in a statement provided to Westword. “During that time period, I posted my concerns about another Black leader leaving Denver Public Schools on several social media channels. I was informed that my social media activity could interfere with the investigation regarding that leader. When I continued to speak out on social media, it was determined that my actions were retaliatory.”

 

Among his many other stunts are when he vowed to stay seated during the Pledge Of Allegiance at school board meetings.

All suspects are, of course, innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

 

 

 

.

Anderson held this press conference the other day:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why aren't there PRO-Whites? There is PRO everyone except for Whites....Hmmmm

 

Black panthers

blm

pro Latino

pro Asians

 

but NO PRO WHITE..... Hmmmm

 

 

Armed Black Supremacists in Tulsa:‘There Will Come a Time When We Will Kill Everything White in Sight’

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/armed-black-supremacists-tulsa-will-come-time-will-kill-everything-white-sight-video/

PASS THIS ON

 ====================================================

 

 

Armed Black Supremacists in Tulsa(said):  

‘There Will Come a Time When We Will Kill Everything White in Sight’ (VIDEO)

 

Share to Gab Clouthub Share

Black activists from the New Black Panther Party and other groups staged an armed march in Tulsa, Oklahoma on Saturday.

Organizers held a Second Amendment “March for Reparations” and marched through downtown Tulsa.

“The struggle for Reparations must be escalated,” a news release from organizers read. “We must fight on every front to achieve redress and Reparations for the atrocities committed upon Tulsa Massacre descendants; and we must intensify the fight to achieve Reparations for all 40-million Blacks still grossly affected by racism, inequality, wealth disparity, police brutality and the like. Tulsa will mark a new beginning in the upgraded fight for Reparations for Black people.”

Activists shouted, “Black power! Black power!

 Another supremacist threatened white people and said, “Because that time will come when there’s a rat-a-tat-tat… black Americans will kill everything white in sight.”

The following groups participated in Saturday’s march:

  • The Huey P Newton Gun Club (HPNGC)
  • The Elmer Geronimo Pratt Gun Club (EGPGC)
  • The New Black Panther Party for Self- Defense (NBPP)
  • The Fred Hampton Gun Club (FHGC)
  • The New Black Liberation Militia (NBLM)
  • The Panther Special Operations Command (PANSOC)
  • ANUBIS
  • Multiple other groups and private gun owners

Meanwhile, the FBI is busy hunting down grandmas who aimlessly wandered through the Capitol on January 6.

 

 

Really????

 

 

 

 

Friday, May 28, 2021

YOU DO NOT QUIT something that you believe in....this a lie!.."Black Lives Matter co-founder quits role amid controversy over $3m property portfolio"

 how many of you gave her your hard earned money so she could buy her THREE MILLION DOLLAR homes etc?

 

 

Black Lives Matter co-founder quits role amid controversy over $3m property portfolio




Verity Bowman



Patrisse Cullors poses for a photo - Amy Harris /Invision/AP
Patrisse Cullors poses for a photo - Amy Harris /Invision/AP

A Black Lives Matter co-founder has resigned from her role as executive director amid controversy over her $3m property portfolio.

Patrisse Cullors, who founded the racial justice movement in 2013, is a self-described “Marxist” but faced criticism after it was reported last month that she owns four properties, including a $1.4m house in Malibu and a ranch in Georgia.

The 37-year-old says she was the victim of “right-wing attacks that tried to discredit my character,” and that her resignation had long been planned because she has a new book and television deal.

"I've created the infrastructure and the support, and the necessary bones and foundation, so that I can leave," she said.

"It feels like the time is right.

“I don’t operate off of what the right thinks about me,” she added as she denied that finances had any relation to her resignation.

Black Lives Matter supporters and others march across the Brooklyn Bridge to honor George Floyd on the one year anniversary of his death on May 25, 2021 - Spencer Platt /Getty Images North America 
Black Lives Matter supporters and others march across the Brooklyn Bridge to honor George Floyd on the one year anniversary of his death on May 25, 2021 - Spencer Platt /Getty Images North America

BLM said she had "received a total of $120,000 since the organisation's inception” following the 2013 acquittal of George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer who killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida.

This was for duties such as serving as spokesperson and engaging in political education work.

Claims that she had misused donations to purchase property were strongly denied and last month she told the Black News Channel that suggestions of financial impropriety against her were "categorically untrue and incredibly dangerous".

But she faced criticism from BLM organisers over the way she has spent her money.

“If you go around calling yourself a socialist, you have to ask how much of her own personal money is going to charitable causes,” Hawk Newsome, a Black Lives Matter organiser, told The New York Post.

"It's really sad because it makes people doubt the validity of the movement."

BLM collected $90 million in donations last year, as the movement hit the global spotlight following the murder of George Floyd by police officer Derek Chauvin, in Minneapolis.

The foundation spent a third of that sum in 2020 on operating expenses, grants to black-led organisations and other charitable giving.

But concerns have been raised as to how much of the funding was spent on racial justice programmes.

Activists called for more transparency and said more should be given to the black communities directly impacted by police brutality.

“That is the most tragic aspect,” said the Rev T Sheri Dickerson, the president of an Oklahoma City BLM chapter and a representative of the BLM10, a national group of organisers that has publicly criticised the foundation over funding and transparency.

“I know some of [the families] are feeling exploited, their pain exploited, and that’s not something that I ever want to be affiliated with.”

Ms Cullors and the foundation said that they support families without disclosing finances or making public announcements.

In 2018, Ms Cullors’ book "When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir” became a New York Times bestseller.

She will release a second book, "An Abolitionists Handbook”, in October and has a multi-year deal with Warner Bros to produce original content centred on black stories.

The first of her TV projects will debut in July, she said.

"I think I will probably be less visible, because I won't be at the helm of one of the largest, most controversial organisations right now in the history of our movement," Ms Cullors said.

"I'm aware that I'm a leader, and I don't shy away from that. But no movement is one leader."

As she departs, the foundation is bringing aboard two new interim senior executives to help steer it in the immediate future: Monifa Bandele, a longtime BLM organiser and founder of the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement in New York City, and Makani Themba, an early backer of the BLM movement and chief strategist at Higher Ground Change Strategies in Jackson, Mississippi.

"I think both of them come with not only a wealth of movement experience, but also a wealth of executive experience," Ms Cullors said.





  •  

    Moderna and Pfizer are already developing COVID-19 vaccine boosters. Do we need a third shot?

     

     

     

    Moderna and Pfizer are already developing COVID-19 vaccine boosters. Do we need a third shot?

    Vaccine makers say immunity to the virus can begin to wane after six or eight months. But more clinical data is needed, experts say

    Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine vials are seen at a mobile vaccination clinic in Los Angeles.

    AFP via Getty Images

    It looks like Americans may need to roll up their sleeves for a COVID-19 booster shot, though vaccine makers and federal officials are still trying to detect how long immunity to the virus lasts. 

    In the latest race to the regulatory finish line, Pfizer Inc. PFE, 0.30% is testing its experimental COVID-19 booster shot in combination with its 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in older adults, while Moderna Inc. MRNA, 3.16% told investors this month that a mid-stage clinical trial showed its investigational booster can help protect against the serious B.1.351 and P.1. variants.

    Moderna and Pfizer both developed two-dose, mRNA vaccines with similar rates of real-world effectiveness.

    The COVID-19 vaccines developed by these companies, as well as the Johnson & Johnson JNJ, 0.44% shot — the third vaccine to be authorized in the U.S. — are all considered very effective, especially when it comes to preventing hospitalization and death, but it’s still unknown how long they can protect people against the virus.

    See also: Booster dose of COVID vaccines to be given to U.K. volunteers in new trial

    “We do not have data on when to expect waning immunity leading to breakthrough infections,” Dr. Stephen Hoge, Moderna’s president, told investors, according to a FactSet transcript of a May 6 earnings call. “But we do know that there is a raging pandemic, that reinfections will happen at some point, and the best way to ensure that we do not have renewed outbreaks in well-vaccinated countries is to boost and maintain the highest possible levels of neutralizing antibodies.”

    Moderna and Pfizer have recently said immunity can start to wane between six to eight months after getting the second shot of their vaccines. Dr. Peter Marks, a Food and Drug Administration official, estimates that vaccine-induced immunity is around one year, according to public remarks reported by CNBC

    “I would project that it’s actually going to be longer than that,” Dr. Mark Mulligan, director of NYU Langone Health’s Vaccine Center, said in a May 3 interview. “It might be a year or even more. But in all likelihood, for boosting of the magnitude of the antibody levels and other immune responses, boosters will be needed.”

    If SARS-CoV-2 becomes an endemic virus, as some medical experts have predicted, boosters are one way to keep people protected and also address gaps in immunity caused by powerful variants like B.1.351, first detected in South Africa, and the P.1 first identified in Brazil that are thought to lessen the effectiveness of these vaccines.

    However, at this point, it’s all speculation. There is no medical consensus about whether booster shots are necessary to ensure continued protection against this virus or even what the durability of immunity to this virus is. 

    “There’s absolutely no evidence that we need a booster shot of anything,” Dr. Carlos del Rio, an infectious-disease physician and executive associate dean of the Emory University School of Medicine, said April 28. “The most important thing to do is to get vaccinated right now. Whether you’re going to need a booster shot, we’ll worry about that later.”

    The case for-or-against booster shots 

    The only data about the length of vaccine-induced immunity, which likely takes into account antibody titer levels and T-cell response, is limited at this time.

    “We do not know precisely when we will need to boost,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical advisor, said Tuesday during a White House briefing.

    One study found that the Pfizer vaccine, which was developed with BioNTech SE BNTX, 3.00%, has a 91.3% efficacy rate among clinical-trial participants six months after they got the second dose. Other research indicates that people who are enrolled in the Phase 1 clinical study for Moderna’s vaccine still had antibodies six months after getting the second shot. 

    “It’s likely that it’s not just a single booster but that this would be a repeated event over the next several years,” Mulligan said. “If we achieve broad enough vaccination to shut down virus transmission and have the pandemic die out, great. But we’re so far [from] that right now.”

    About 39% of people in the U.S. are fully vaccinated, as of Tuesday, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, though vaccination rates in the U.S. have been slowing for weeks.

    Other experts disagree with the push for boosters, citing a lack of data. 

    Cornell University virologist John Moore recently told Axios “it’s not proven that we need boosters yet. Whereas it’s appropriate to plan for boosters, you’ve got to look at whether there’s a corporate agenda behind this.”

    Del Rio instead predicts a future in which the U.S. will have the virus under control, and Americans may need a COVID-19 booster to travel to certain countries, much like how a yellow fever vaccine or booster is recommended or required for travel to certain Central and South American and African countries.

    “I suspect that if there’s a variant in India, and you decide to travel to India, you will be told, as part of your travel, you’re going to have to take this,” he said. 

    Are boosters another billion-dollar opportunity for vaccine makers?

    COVID-19 vaccines are already a booming business for drug makers, and boosters are part of the corporate strategy going forward. (Moderna executives mentioned their booster shot dozens of times on their most recent earnings call.)

    Pfizer and BioNTech expect their vaccine to generate $26 billion in revenue this year, while Moderna just reported its first-ever billion-dollar sales quarter.

    While the U.S. government has not announced any purchases of COVID-19 booster shots, other countries have. Australia, Israel, and Switzerland have already inked deals with these drug makers to buy millions of booster doses for 2022.

    Pfizer anticipates it will get data for its booster candidate in July, with plans to file for authorization that same month and then get a regulatory okay in the U.S. sometime in 2021.

    The company is developing two types of shots: one functions like a third dose of its currently available vaccine, aiming to boost immunity among participants from its Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S., and the other uses a modified mRNA sequence. It announced the booster/pneumococcal conjugate vaccine study this week. 

    Moderna is testing three types of boosters:

    • A booster that acts like a third dose to its original two-dose vaccine.
    • A booster that specifically aims to address the B.1.351 and P.1 variants. (Both of these variants are of particular concern to Moderna and Pfizer because the companies ran their pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials at a time before those variants had been identified as concerning.)
    • A booster that is made up of a 50/50 mix of its original vaccine and the booster targeting the B.1.351 variant.

    What about other vaccine makers?

    J&J has not yet shared any longer-term data about its vaccine’s immune response, though executives have noted that the company plans to assess whether there is a need to develop a booster.

    However, some Wall Street analysts have said it’s easier to develop boosters for mRNA and protein-based vaccines than adenovirus-based vaccines like the J&J shot. (Novavax Inc. NVAX, -2.03% is an example of a company developing a protein-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate.)

    Sanofi SNY, 0.96%, which has previously reported some delays moving its COVID-19 vaccine through development, recently hinted to investors that its still-investigational single-dose COVID-19 shot may have more value as a booster. The vaccine candidate is expected to move into Phase 3 clinical trials, and it will also be tested in a booster-specific study.

    That said, boosters and vaccination in general doesn’t need to be a one-size-fits-all model for every single person.

    The U.S. could test out a different approach for booster shots that evaluates an individual’s antibody levels to assess whether or not they need a booster shot at all, said Dr. Michael Mina, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. This is because immunity shows up differently in different people, based on factors like age and overall health.

    “It would be super easy to set up, and it could be voluntary,” Mina said. “Do you want a booster? Do you want to see if you need a booster? To get there, we would really want to start building correlates of protection, meaning: what is the antibody level that we feel good as a physician or as a public health agency saying, if you’re at this level, you’re probably still protected.”