BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
The New Mexico House Majority Leader is in serious trouble after being charged in a massive embezzlement scheme.
Rep. Sheryl Williams Stapleton may have embezzled upwards of $954,000 dollars in a racketeering, laundering and illegal kickbacks scheme.
The New Mexico Democrat was the eventual recipient of up to 60% of
the government contracts with Robotics Management Learning Systems LCC, a
D.C. based company.
Law enforcement agents have executed search warrants at the home and business of state Rep. Sheryl Williams Stapleton.
According to a filed warrant, she is under investigation for racketeering, money laundering and receiving illegal kickbacks.
In April, newly-appointed Albuquerque Public Schools Superintendent Scott Elder submitted a letter to
the New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas referencing “Suspected
Violations of Governmental Conduct Act and Procurement Code.”
According to the warrant, every invoice issued by Robotics to APS was
for an even dollar amount, no cents, and in unchanging amounts over the
years. Most were reportedly for $40,000. In all, APS paid Robotics more
than $5.3 million.
Rep. Williams Stapleton is also directly involved with four companies
that received payments from Robotics: The Charlie Morrisey Center for
Creative Assitance Inc., the Ujima Foundation, S. Williams and
Associates, and local restaurant A Taste of The Caribbean.
Evidence suggests that she was eventual recipient of 60% of the APS money — $954,386. Investigators are looking into additional payments that were redirected into her personal bank accounts.
State Democrats said they were “shocked and dismayed” with the allegations against their crooked cohort.
A Minnesota woman had the most horrific experience of her life after
both her legs had to be amputated after contracting COVID-19 despite
being vaccinated.
Jummai Nache, a Nigerian healthcare worker in Minneapolis, received
the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on February 1 but still
contracted COVID-19 a few days later.
Her condition soon deteriorated and she had to be
hospitalized, with her legs now amputated. What’s worse is that she will
soon have both her hands amputated as well. Nache’s family is now
clueless and is trying to find out answers if the Pfizer vaccine is the
reason behind her medical condition.
Nache, who works as a medical assistant, was taken to hospital by her
husband Philip a few days after she received her Pfizer COVID-19
vaccine as she had developed some reactions and was having severe chest
pain. A day later, she tested positive for COVID-19, and her condition
quickly deteriorated and she had to be hospitalized, according to a
Daily Mail report.
So much so that her legs started swelling and rotting and eventually
had to be amputated. The family is now clueless about what to do as her
hands too will now require amputation.
“Jummai and I were shocked when we received the result that she was
Covid-19 positive because she had not manifested any symptom before
taking the shot,” Philip wrote in a letter attached to a GoFundMe for
the couple.
Here is more from the GoFundMe account set up for Jummai.
Philip Nache, Jummai’s husband wrote this on their GoFundMe page.
As a result of the above complications, the Infectious Disease Dr
decided to forward the case to CDC. According to the Dr, after going
back and forth with the CDC, they decided to meet to deliberate with
many experts around the country in which about 70-80 doctors met on a
virtual call to discuss Jummai’s case. About 8 weeks after the meeting
the CDC sent us a letter of their conclusions which stated that Jummai
was infected with MIS-A and covid-19, but they cannot conclude whether
the covid-19 vaccine contributed for now. Since Jummai’s blood specimen
which was taken at the onset of this nightmare is saved in the lab, we
pray for God’s provision of a separate body of experts who could study
Jummai’s very unique case to draw other conclusions. As the CDC related,
Jummai’s case is very unique. Since my request to be in that meeting
was not granted, I submitted the following questions for the CDC
experts’ response:
1. When her symptoms started, I was with her, eating and sleeping
together, but I tested negative and did not have any symptoms. Why am I
not positive?
2. If she got the vaccine before the virus or got them at the same
time, did the clashing of the covid-19 and the vaccine cause such
adverse reactions? Why didn’t the CDC or Pfizer let us know? Or why
wouldn’t they ask everyone to be tested for covid-19 first, before
taking the vaccine?
3. If the vaccine is meant to defeat the virus, either by destroying
it or weakening its effect, why the adverse severe damage? If the
vaccine did not work to defeat the virus, what role was the vaccine
playing in Jummai’s body?
On one occasion, the doctor called and told me that Jummai could die
at any moment, but God preserved my wife’s life in a miraculous way in
response to all the prayers of the church.
Dr. Robert Malone,
M.D., M.S.,, a distinguished physician who discovered RNA transfection
and invented mRNA vaccines, was on Steve Bannon’s War Room Weednesday
with some alarming news–new data indicates that people who have taken
the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are at greater risk of getting Covid
than someone who is not vaccinated.
Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), sometimes less precisely called immune enhancement or disease enhancement, is a phenomenon in which binding of a virus to suboptimal antibodies enhances its entry into hostcells, followed by its replication.[1][2] ADE may cause enhanced respiratory disease
and acute lung injury after respiratory virus infection (ERD) with
symptoms of monocytic infiltration and an excess of eosinophils in
respiratory tract.[3]
ADE along with type 2 T helper cell-dependent mechanisms may contribute
to a development of the vaccine associated disease enhancement (VADE),
which is not limited to respiratory disease.
According NBC reporting (I can’t believe I’m citing that outfit as a reliable source):
New
data suggests that fully vaccinated individuals are not just contracting
COVID, but could be carrying higher levels of virus than previously
understood, facilitating spread, my NBC News colleagues are reporting.
New indoor masking guidance expected today.
Dr. Malone has warned of this risk for several months. What are we to
do? Malone says that instead of relying on the flawed vaccines, Doctors
should use drugs for treating Covid that have proved effective, such as
Ivermectin (more about that following the video), is neutralizing
Covid:
What should scare the hell out of you is the extraordinary efforts
being taken to silence and discredit Dr. Malone. I encourage you to read
Michael Haynes piece from July 5, which details Malone’s Kafkaesque ordeal. Here are some relevant paragraphs from his article:
Information about the inventor of the mRNA technology used in certain
COVID-19 vaccines was removed from the online encyclopedia site
Wikipedia after he publicly warned against giving the experimental gene
therapy vaccines to young people and that there was insufficient
information about the injections to give informed consent. . . .
On June 10, 2021, Dr. Malone joined
biologist Bret Weinstein, Ph.D, on the Dark Horse Podcast, where Malone
raised numerous safety concerns about the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna
COVID-19 vaccines, both of which use mRNA technology. He warned about
future autoimmune issues caused by the spike proteins within the mRNA
injections.
Malone also stated that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was
aware that the spike proteins were “biologically active and could travel
from the injection site and cause adverse events, and that the spike
protein, if biologically active, is very dangerous.”
YouTube swiftly moved to censor clips from the three-hour podcast interview.
This is the kind of authoritarian censorship carried out by Adolf
Hitler, Josef Stalin and Pol Pot. When the media and the Government
conspire to quash dissenting opinions and legitimate, provable facts, we
have crossed the threshold of fascism.
The same effort to discredit Dr. Malone also has been unleashed
against non-vaccine treatment methods. Remember what happened to anyone
who dared suggest using Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin?
And do you remember the news stories in May about how Covid was
devastating India? I bet you have heard little about the efficacy of
Ivermectin in stopping Covid in Dehli.
Dr. Pierre Kory told the world on December 8, 2020, that Ivermectin
“obliterates” this virus. Obliterate means to decimate, demolish, or
annihilate. It means to eliminate or destroy all trace, indication, or
significance.
This graph shows that Ivermectin, used in Delhi beginning April 20,
obliterated their COVID crisis. No one should be able to talk you out of
this – not a salesman, a drug company, a television celebrity doc, and
certainly not the top doctor for the WHO or the NIH who is paid to do
that.
It is your duty as an American to challenge and question everything
the Government represents as true. We now have concrete evidence that
Dr. Anthony Fauci has taken diametrically opposed positions without
blinking an eye. Some call that “lying.” The same with the CDC (as I
pointed out in my last article). Perhaps the CDC should be renamed the
Center for Disinformation & Confusion in light of the contradictory
guidance issued regarding masks and vaccines.
Advertisement - story continues below
Unfortunately, the chaos of Biden’s Covid policy reflects the
dysfunction and incompetence evident in the rest of his Administration.
Keep praying and continue to resist.
The OpenVAERS website released its most recent weekly numbers on Saturday.
*OpenVAERS.com* is currently down. It has been down for hours.
OpenVAERS is a privately run site that data mines the official CDC VAERS
site. The more difficult to read CDC-linked *VAERS* website is still up.
According to the website there are now 11,405 reported deaths from the COVID vaccines in the United States according to the latest numbers.
The number of deaths linked to the CDC promoted vaccines this year has absolutely skyrocketed. According to the CDC’s own data.
The OpenVAERS database contains information on unverified
reports of adverse events (illnesses, health problems and/or symptoms)
following immunization with US-licensed vaccines. The CDC government
website links to VAERS platform.
Obviously, the VAERS website has gained much attention — not from the
fake news mainstream media — but from Americans seeking the truth on
the COVID vaccines.
This had the vaccine pushers in a panic. They immediately called on the tech giants to “fact-check” anyone who would report on the CDC-linked website’s numbers.
But now the VAERS website is offline.
It’s been offline for hours.
As hundreds of illegal immigrants surge across the southern border
daily, migrants from Africa are gaining entry into the United States
with free plane tickets paid funded by American taxpayers.
Asylum seekers wanting entry to the United States from Africa
typically embark on journeys to South America by boat or plane, then
make a treacherous trek on foot through Colombia and Panama towards the
United States.
Now, migrants and their families can entirely circumvent checkpoints at the U.S. southern border
Miles4Migrants, a 501(c)(3) charity dedicated to donating frequent
flyer miles to refugees and their family members provides free flights
to thousands of Africans refugees into the interior of the U.S.
Advertisement - story continues below
Miles4Migrants, which is funded by the Shapiro Foundation and the
Tripadvisor Foundation, works with Delta Airlines, American Airlines,
United Airlines, Uber, and a network of over 50 nonprofit partners
including the UNHCR, the United Nations Refugee Agency.
Advertisement - story continues below
In June, Uber launched a ride credit fund to support Miles4Milate,
allowing migrants to safely get to their destination using donated
frequent flyer miles and credit card points.
The Democratic Republic of Congo Africa has been the primary country
of origin of refugees seeking admittance to the United States following
the country’s 2019 Ebola outbreak according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Illegal immigrants can also receive free commercial flights into the
U.S. interior from Catholic Charities, a non-profit organization funded
by US taxpayers.
Advertisement - story continues below
Catholic Charities has assisted more than 700 border crossers with
“pass[ing] through the hotels” in southern California before taking off
on commercial flights to resettle into the U.S. interior, Daily Mail reports.
Once into the United States, illegal immigrants are allowed to bypass
photo identification requirements all American citizens are required to
adhere to. They are able to board flights without a photo ID and do not
have to verify their coronavirus or vaccination status.
Migrants are relying on the network of nonprofit organizations for entry into the US.
Advertisement - story continues below
While the Trump administration purchased discounted tickets
to deport illegal migrants back to their countries of origin, Biden’s
catch and release mandate essentially accommodate illegal aliens with a
taxi service.
Since Biden has taken office in January, “the number of [illegal
immigrant] minors in federal custody has more than tripled to over
7,000. In response, the Biden administration has flown approximately
7,200 border-crossers into the U.S. interior on domestic commercial
flights from February 19 to April 22 and continues to offer free flights
to illegal aliens to their destination of choice.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is reportedly directing “ICE to help transport migrants northward so they can be processed and released.”
Biden officials are also placing border crossers in free hotel rooms
at $71 to $90 a night who stay for sometimes less than 48 hours before
one of the assisting nonprofit organizations puts them on commercial
flights, for free, into the U.S. interior.
Advertisement - story continues below
While the Biden administration’s open border policy welcomes migrants
from around the world with open arms, Cubans fleeing persecution from a
communist dictator in Cuba are the exception.
Any Cuban who tries to sail over to Florida or the US in any location
“will not come” into America, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro
Mayorkas warned.
“Do not risk your life attempting to enter the United States
illegally,” Mayorkas said in a July 14 briefing. “You will not come to
the United States.”
Even Cubans who make it to the US and can prove they face torture and
literal danger will be sent to “third countries” to be resettled.
Another coronavirus variant has reached Florida. Here's what you need to know.
Lateshia Beachum
A
coronavirus variant discovered in Colombia is showing up among patients
in South Florida, increasing infections and putting health officials on
alert as calls grow louder for unvaccinated individuals to get
inoculated.
Carlos Migoya, CEO of Jackson Health System, told WPLG
in Miami earlier this week that the B.1.621 variant has accounted for
about 10% of coronavirus patients, trailing behind delta, the now
dominant variant in the United States that's been ravaging the nation's
unvaccinated, and the gamma variant. B.1.621 has yet to receive a
Greek-letter designation as more prominent variants have.
Migoya
told the news station that he speculated B.1.621 is likely rising in
South Florida because of international travel between Colombia and
Miami, which serves as a gateway to Latin America.
A person who replied to an email sent from The Washington Post to Migoya's office said he was unavailable to comment.
Health
experts will keep B.1.621 on their radar as the fall season looms and
as parts of the country still lag in their vaccination efforts, experts
told The Post.
Video: Fauci and Walensky comment on new CDC mask guidance
The
earliest documented samples of B.1.621 were noted in January, and at
least 16 cases have been recently reported in the United Kingdom, where
health officials have noted that the majority of cases linked to the
variant were the result of international travel.
Public Health
England noted last week that there is currently no evidence to indicate
that the variant causes more severe disease or evades the efficacy of
vaccines. Yet, the agency has designated the variant to be under
investigation as it continues to conduct lab testing to better
understand the impact mutations have on the coronavirus.
The
European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention has also chosen to
assign the variant as one of interest, as evidence could suggest
significant impact, but also noting that much of the data is preliminary
and marked with many questions.
In the United States, the variant
has yet to be named a variant of interest of concern, accounting for
just more than 2.1% of cases as of July 17, noted John Sellick, a
professor at the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at
the University at Buffalo.
"The only time it becomes important is
if it gives virus selective advantage, which we've seen with delta
variant," he said. "We'll see with this one. . . . What we have to see
is two weeks from now, or four weeks from now, is this going to do
another trick and wind up being more?"
Sellick noted how quickly
the delta variant went from accounting for just more than 10% of cases
at the beginning of June to more than 80% of cases by mid July.
The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is monitoring more than 10
other variants in addition to B.1.621 that's popping up in South
Florida.
Only time will provide more information about B.1.621, Sellick said.
"If
this thing is really more transmissible and goes from two percent [of
infections] to 30 percent or to 60 percent; we don't want to see that,"
he said. "It has to be more fit than the delta variant. It would have to
be more transmissible."
It doesn't take much time for variants to
spread, especially among unvaccinated people, said Preeti N. Malani,
chief health officer and a professor of medicine in the Division of
Infectious Diseases at the University of Michigan.
Malani pointed
to drug company Biogen's annual leadership conference in February 2020,
from which the coronavirus spread across Massachusetts and the country,
as an example of how quickly variants can spread.
"If you have a
lot of unvaccinated people gathering and then they're going back home,
you could have very rapid transmission in few weeks," she said.
Concerns about variants really set in when they are more contagious or elude the vaccine, she said.
Many
worries about variants and further infections can be mitigated with
more people choosing to get vaccinated, but that effort has become like a
"whack-a-mole" initiative as new variants emerge and fears about
vaccination hinder progress, she said.
"This concept of risk is
interesting. We understand we take risks with a lot of things," she
said, mentioning car travel or late-night dog walks as examples. "With
coronavirus, that risk seems so high to some to and others it's not.
[The risk is] somewhere in the middle. The risk of vaccination is really
rare. As we move forward, the risk is not going to go to zero anytime
soon."
As the Delta variant continues to cause havoc across the
country along with other coronavirus variants making their debut in new
infections, it might be time to reconsider travel and social plans even
if one is vaccinated, experts say.
"This is a novel coronavirus. We're still learning about it," Malani said. "Each of these variants bring new challenges."
Biden Hater's Banners That Town Called Obscene Can Stay Up, Court Rules
Ed Shanahan and Tracey Tully
A
New Jersey woman can leave up several banners that use what local
officials called an obscenity to express her hostility toward President
Joe Biden, a state court ruled Tuesday.
The ruling came after the
woman, Andrea Dick of Roselle Park, enlisted the American Civil
Liberties Union of New Jersey to fight a municipal judge’s order that
she take the banners off a fence outside the house where she lives with
her mother or face $250 a day in fines.
After the civil liberties
group joined the case, Roselle Park officials backpedaled on their
earlier demand that Dick take down the banners and effectively dropped
the matter.
“I
feel amazing,” Dick, 54, said after the Superior Court of New Jersey
dismissed the case, which was brought against her mother, Patricia
Dilascio, who owns the home where the banners have hung since the
Memorial Day weekend.
“I’m glad it’s over,” added Dick, who said
she had gotten angry calls and at least 20 pieces of hate mail from as
far away as California, North Carolina and Texas after reports about the
dispute over the banners attracted national attention.
The clash
was the latest such episode to emerge from America’s fractured political
landscape and to highlight the delicate balance local officials must
sometimes strike between defending free speech and responding to
concerns about language that some residents find offensive.
The
conflict involved three of 10 banners that Dick, a die-hard supporter of
former President Donald Trump, had hung at the house. They included a
crude word whose use the Supreme Court long ago ruled could not be
restricted simply to protect those it offends.
Roselle Park
officials, citing complaints from neighbors and concerns that children
on their way to a nearby school could be exposed to the vulgar language,
asked Dick to remove the banners. When she did not, she was issued a
summons for violating a local obscenity ordinance and ordered to appear
in borough court.
There, Judge Gary A. Bundy ruled against Dick,
saying there were “alternative methods for the defendant to express her
pleasure or displeasure with certain political figures in the United
States” and noting the home’s proximity to a school.
“Freedom of
speech is not simply an absolute right,” Bundy added, while noting that
“the case is not a case about politics. It is a case, pure and simple,
about language. This ordinance does not restrict political speech.”
Dick
vowed to challenge the ruling on free speech grounds, and the civil
liberties group stepped in, filing a brief on her behalf in Superior
Court. At that point, Roselle Park officials reversed course and
dismissed the summons.
In a statement, Jarrid H. Kantor, the borough attorney, said Roselle Park stood by the summons and agreed with Bundy’s decision.
“However,”
Kantor continued, “the borough feels that the continued attention
garnered by the inappropriate display and the escalating costs to the
taxpayers of continuing to litigate the matter causes far greater harm
to the borough, as a whole, than good.”
Mayor Joseph Signorello
III called the matter a “moral loss” for Roselle Park, a town of 14,000
people about a 40-minute drive from Times Square that voted
overwhelmingly for Biden in November.
“Those signs are offensive,” said Signorello, a Democrat. “And were I a neighbor, I would be offended.”
“You cannot legislate decency,” he added, “and I think that’s a sad reality.”
The civil liberties group hailed the court’s action as an “uncomplicated” victory for free speech.
“The
First Amendment exists specifically to make sure people can express
strong opinions on political issues, or any other matter, without fear
of punishment by the government,” Amol Sinha, the executive director of
the group’s New Jersey chapter, said in a statement.
Alexander
Shalom, the group’s senior supervising attorney, responded to Kantor’s
reference to the potential cost of litigation by saying it was “fiscally
prudent” for Roselle Park to drop the matter because it was “a sure
loser for them.”
Thomas Healy, a Seton Hall University law
professor, had predicted in an earlier interview that the move to compel
Dick to remove the banners was doomed. He cited a 1971 Supreme Court
decision, Cohen v. California, that turned on the question of whether
the same word at issue in Dick’s case was obscene.
“I’m not
surprised,” Healy said Tuesday after learning that Roselle Park
officials had backed off. “They never should have brought the case to
begin with.” Still, he added, it was “no small matter to put Ms. Dick
through this.”
Conflicts like the one involving Dick have come up
this year on Long Island; in Indiana, Tennessee and Connecticut; and
elsewhere.
On Wednesday, the code enforcement board in Punta
Gorda, Florida, is set to rule on a summons issued to a resident for
violating a recently adopted indecency provision by displaying an
anti-Biden banner with a similarly crude message.
Jay Nadelson, a
member of the board, said he believed the provision was
unconstitutional. Asked how he thought the meeting on Wednesday would
go, he said he expected it to be “contentious.”
Signorello of
Roselle Park said the borough planned to alter its regulations to limit
how much signage can appear on a homeowner’s property. Dick’s banners
would most likely not be subject to any new rules because she hung them
before any changes occurred, he said.
As far as Dick is concerned, the banners are not going anywhere.
“What’s up there is staying until I’m told differently,” she said.