NO they are smart and will make up their OWN minds about vaccines.
Bullies !!!
Oh by the way... Meg and Harry moved to CA because they wanted to live a "PRIVATE life".
They have spent more time in front of cameras now that they moved.
.
Meg RUNS Harry LOL..
.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-study-shows-1-1000-develop-heart-inflammation-covid-vaccination-myocarditis-related-heart-conditions-increased-death-rate-within-5-years-risk-higher-dying-v/
Please make this post go viral..... please
===================================================
A shocking new study that was conducted by researchers at Canada’s University of Ottawa Heart Institute found that one out of every thousand(1/1000) mRNA Covid-19 vaccinations causes heart inflammation(myopericarditis) to develop rapidly in otherwise healthy individuals.
The study looked at over 32,000 individuals who had received either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines and monitored them for heart-related conditions between June 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021.
32 of the study subjects were admitted into the hospital with heart and chest-related symptoms.
“There were 15,997 doses of Moderna vaccine, and 16,382 doses of Pfizer vaccine administered over the study period, for a total of 32,379 doses. Note that these numbers represent a mixture of first and second doses.
Therefore, if our cohort captured all cases in the Ottawa area, then the incidence of myocarditis would be 0.1% of all vaccine doses (32 cases/32,379 doses x 100), or 10 cases of myocarditis for every 10,000 doses of vaccine.”
Researchers found that the symptoms show up extremely quickly after vaccination, usually after the patient’s second dose. On average, people who were affected developed the condition after just 1.5 days.
They also found that men are at a much greater risk than women – only 2 women experienced heart inflammation.
“32 patients were identified over the period of interest. Eighteen patients were diagnosed with myocarditis; 12 with myopericarditis; and 2 with pericarditis alone.
The median age was 33 years (18-65 years). The sex ratio was 2 females to 29 males.
In 5 cases, symptoms developed after only a single dose of mRNA vaccine. In 27 patients, symptoms developed after their second dose of. Median time between vaccine dose and symptoms was 1.5 days (1-26 days).”
People who took the Moderna jab were 3x more likely to develop symptoms than those who took the Pfizer shot.
To date, this has been the largest case study that has looked at the correlation between Covid mRNA vaccines and myocarditis symptoms within a month of vaccination.
If the results are true, it would actually be more of a risk for anyone under 65 to receive the shot than it would be to contract the virus and recover, especially depending on how young they are. Myocarditis and pericarditis both come with an extremely poor prognosis and end up killing over 50% within 3-10 years of their diagnosis.
According to the most recent data, Americans under 65 have about a 1 in 1863 (Population – 273,820,000 / Total Covid deaths – 146,991) or .00054 chance of dying from Covid-19 or .054%. If you lower the age to 50 and under, the chance that Covid is fatal drops precipitously to .00017 or 1 in 5841 or .o17%.
In other words, the chances that covid will kill you if you are under 50 are almost 6x lower than the chances you will develop a debilitating (and often fatal in the long run) heart condition.
Even more shocking – people under 40 who take the jab are almost 13.5 times more likely to develop some form of myocarditis or pericarditis than to be killed by Covid. Keep in mind the median age from this study was 33.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden and the tyrannical health regime double down on their goal to get “every American” vaccinated by cramming down a new dictatorial federal mandate with a third experimental ‘booster’ jab being prepared for a massive rollout.
The Covid-19 vaccine has been so ‘effective’ in ‘protecting’ people that the masses will now be pressured into taking another dose as new outbreaks of the virus have forced a new wave of authoritarian restrictions.
Advertisement - story continues below
Every single American has known for months where to go and how to get a vaccine if they wanted one. In fact, over 181 million eligible citizens have been fully vaccinated in the US – If the virus was as deadly as they are making it out to be, they wouldn’t have to mandate people to take the vaccine; and on the other end, if the vaccines provided the protection they’re supposed to provide, the vaccinated wouldn’t be calling people killers because they are refusing to ‘protect others.’
Besides, according to available data, a third of the entire US population had contracted Covid BY THE END OF 2020. Natural immunity has always proven to be superior to vaccines.
A recent study that was conducted in Israel on 800,000 individuals confirms that is especially the case with the rushed mRNA Covid vaccines.
They found that individuals who had received both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were 13x more likely to contract Covid-19 than those who had natural immunity – Fully vaccinated people were also found to be at a “GREATER RISK OF HOSPITALIZATION.”
If 1/3rd of Americans had already contracted the virus – before it had even been known for a full year – then why would “everyone” be forced to take the experimental vaccine?
Exactly what sCiEnCe is being followed with these vaccine mandates and passports?
Submit a Correction
You JERK.... this girl is dead leave your nasty ass comments to your mirror.
In media news today, the media peddles a narrative that horseback Border Patrol agents were using whips on Haitian migrants, Jen Psaki gets hammered for citing Biden's history with grief while discussing errant Afghanistan drone strike, and the media frets over too many white Emmy winners
CNN anchor Don Lemon suggested Monday the skin color of Brian Laundrie, fiancé to Gabby Petito, awarded him the "privilege" of not talking to police during the investigation into her disappearance and possible death.
Petito’s case has captured the country since she went missing earlier this month. Authorities found a body Sunday in Wyoming’s Grand Teton National Park believed to be the missing young woman, while the current whereabouts of Laundrie, who has been named a person of interest in the case, remain unknown. The discovered body will undergo an autopsy Tuesday.
Laundrie's family members were instructed by their attorney not to talk to the authorities, which Lemon chalked up to "privilege."
GABBY PETITO: POLICE DECLARE ‘CRIME SCENE’ AS FBI ENTERS BRIAN LAUNDRIE'S FLORIDA HOME: LIVE UPDATES
"You ask any person of color, you ask a Black man who – if they have that sort of privilege," Lemon said Monday night.
"It's not privilege, it's a right," CNN's Chris Cuomo said, pushing back. He added that any defense attorney would advise their client not to talk to the police because they can use whatever they say against them.
Lemon argued that while cops are the good guys in many cases, they "aren't" in many more instances. He painted a picture of what he believed often transpired behind closed doors when police take Black people and poor people into custody, as many, he said aren't able to afford a lawyer.
"Do you think like someone who, a Don Lemon, if I wasn't who I am, they'd be like, ‘Hey, get your butt in here! What do you know about the disappearance of such and such? Why won’t you talk? Do you need a lawyer because you're guilty?' All of that would go down," Lemon said of the police's behavior.
MSNBC's Joy Reid also evoked race in her analysis of Petito's disappearance, referring Monday to the media coverage of her case as "Missing White woman syndrome."
"It goes without saying that no family should ever have to endure that kind of pain. And the Petito family certainly deserves answers and justice," Reid said on "The ReidOut" Monday night. "But the way this story has captivated the nation has many wondering, why not the same media attention when people of color go missing?"
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Lemon raised a similar point, noting to viewers that while he is out in New York City, several people, most of whom were White, have asked him why the networks were spending so much time covering a missing White girl and not other missing young women. The anchor said critics were wrong to accuse him of making the case about race.
"People are talking to me about this as it relates to race," Lemon said. "They've spoken to Chris about it. You see it online. Don't pretend that I'm turning this into something that it's not."
Talking like that... makes people NOT care about people making STUPID comments like YOU!!!
How many would look for you after making such a nasty comment like that?
Rude witch! These people lost their daughter... how dare you, how freaking dare you!
African Americans are made to look bad by jerks like above. Don't judge them all like her, I'm sure they are cringing reading those words. That poor family is grieving and this witch says something so ridiculous and unkind. What if this was YOUR family grieving?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-joy-reid-focus-gabby-petito-case-missing-white-woman-syndrome
"Well, the answer actually has a name: Missing White woman syndrome. The term coined by the late and great Gwen Iffil to describe the media and public fascination with missing White women like Laci Peterson or Natalee Holloway, while ignoring cases involving missing people of color," she added, referencing two well-known cases of missing women.
MSNBC has extensively covered the case and its website Monday morning prominently featured an opinion piece on the missing woman.
Reid spent the remainder of the segment discussing multiple instances of missing Black and Native American individuals she claimed to have never heard about in the same way as the Petito case.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
She also cited statistics from the Black and Missing Foundation that suggested the disparity in media coverage between missing White women and non-White women was attributed to missing minorities often being classified as runaways, minority adults being labeled as associated with crime, and that minorities are dismissed because it's believed they live most of their lives with poverty and crime as a regular part of their lives.
Reid ended the segment by suggesting that missing women of color weren't noticed as much because they didn't look like the daughters or granddaughters of newsroom executives, alluding to one of her guest's earlier claims on the show that stories on missing non-White women weren't sensational enough for the White, middle-aged males leading newsrooms.
A COVID-19 booster shot that may protect against multiple variants is being tested in humans.
It uses new vaccine technology that self-replicates once injected in the muscle.
The vaccine may need a lower dose than existing shots, potentially reducing side effects.
A COVID-19 booster vaccine that could protect against multiple virus variants at once is being tested in humans for the first time.
The vaccine, called GRT-R910, uses a new technology called self-amplifying messenger-ribonucleic acid (mRNA), which replicates itself once injected into muscle. COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna use mRNA, which teaches our body how to make a protein that triggers an immune response, but it cannot self-replicate.
Self-amplifying mRNA promises lower doses than existing vaccines, which means it's potentially cheaper and has fewer side-effects, Insider previously reported.
The trial, which is sponsored by the US National Institute of Health, will eventually recruit 20 volunteers, all over the age of 60, the company said.
Gritstone, the US pharmaceutical company that developed GRT-R910, said in a press release on Monday that the vaccine could boost the immune response of "first generation COVID-19 vaccines" to a "wide array" of coronavirus variants.
Dr. Andrew Allen, chief executive officer at Gritstone, said the immune response could provide "more benefit than an additional dose of the same vaccine."
Results of the trial are expected in early 2022, Gritstone said.
Andrew Ustianowski, honorary clinical chair at University of Manchester and study local lead investigator, said in a statement that "we think GRT-R910 as a booster vaccination will elicit strong, durable, and broad immune responses, which are likely to be critical in maintaining protection of this vulnerable elderly population who are particularly at risk of hospitalisation and death."
Andrew Clarke, 63, and his wife Helen Clarke, 64, were the first to receive GRT-R910 as part of an early stage trial at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK, on Monday.
Self-amplifying mRNA could potentially be developed on hospital sites tailored for specific outbreaks, rather than in large centralized factories.
Professor Ian Bruce, chair at the Manchester COVID-19 Research Rapid Response Group, said in a statement that future studies will examine GRT-R910's efficacy in other-vulnerable populations.
On Friday, the Food and Drug Administration recommended an extra dose of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for fully vaccinated Americans aged 65 and older, and for younger people at risk of severe illness.
Read the original article on Business Insider
They killed an Aide worker and his family of TEN.... SEVEN small children.
Good work Biden... just another lie!
Now the U.S is apologizing but that won't bring those people back.
You have their blood on your hands just like our brave 13 and all the wounded.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-england-journal-medicine-backtracks-now-admits-covid-vax-may-not-safe-pregnant-women/
The esteemed New England Journal of Medicine posted a correction last week and now admits the COVID vaccine may not be safe for pregnant women.
The study was updated after it found that 104 of 827 pregnant participants experienced a spontaneous abortion after receiving the COVID vaccine. That is roughly 1 of 8 pregnant women losing their baby after getting the vaccine.
Via Revolver News.
Here is the corrected update from September 8, 2021:
t the time of publication of preliminary findings in the Original
Article related to this editorial, the number of spontaneous abortions
was 104 and there was 1 stillbirth. However, no proportion could be
determined for the risk of spontaneous abortion among participants
vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation because follow-up information
was not yet available for the majority of those persons. The article has
now been updated. In the fifth paragraph of this editorial (page 2342),
the first sentence should have read, “Among 827 registry
participants who reported a completed pregnancy, 104 experienced
spontaneous abortions and 1 had a stillbirth,” rather than, “…a
completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a spontaneous abortion
in 104 (12.6%) and in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%); these percentages are well
within the range expected as an outcome for this age group of persons
whose other underlying medical conditions are unknown.” In the same
paragraph, in the sentence beginning “Among live-born infants” (page
2343), the expression “were also consistent” should have read, “were
consistent.” In the seventh paragraph, beginning “Given that,” the first
sentence should have ended, “…limitations in their ability to draw
conclusions about spontaneous abortions, congenital anomalies, and other
potential rare neonatal outcomes,” rather than “…to draw conclusions
about congenital anomalies and other potential rare neonatal outcomes.”
The editorial is correct at NEJM.org.
