WE ALL put these celebs where they are today.... then this crap. I believe in FREE Speech but this is HATE.

 

 https://www.foxnews.com/media/jamie-foxx-deletes-apologizes-social-media-post-users-accused-being-horrifically-antisemitic

 

 

 (WE buy the tickets for the movies.... we follow them.... we buy what they're selling.. etc. WE PUT THEM THERE.)

(FREE Speech is for ALL of us... but HATE should NEVER be tolerated.  )

 

(He apologized With a LIE.... he said "they killed a guy named Jesus"....did his so called friend kill Jesus? He WILL NOT BE ABLE GET OUT OF THIS CRAP) 

 

 

 

 

Jamie Foxx deletes and apologizes for social media post users accused of being ‘horrifically antisemitic'

Foxx deleted the post but clarified that it was not intended to be antisemitic at all.

By Gabriel Hays | Fox News

Jamie Foxx chased down Queeni Glen in Chicago who hadn't realized she lost her purse. The actor got out of the car to give her a hug and hand her the bag.

"Django Unchained" actor Jamie Foxx recently courted controversy with a cryptic comment referring to those who "killed this dude name[d] Jesus" that multiple social media users saw as antisemitic.

Following the backlash, Foxx deleted the post, and shared another one apologizing for it and claiming it was in no way intended to be antisemitic. He said it was just about "a fake friend" who wronged him.

Foxx shared the original post with his nearly 17 million Instagram followers on Friday. The message consisted of simple white text on a black background that read in all caps, "THEY KILLED THIS DUDE NAME JESUS… WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY’LL DO TO YOU???!"

Jamie Foxx recently deleted and apologized for a tweet that some people accused of being "antisemitic." (Axelle/Bauer-Griffin)

At the end of the somewhat vague message, Foxx added, "#fakefriends" and "#fakelove."

Multiple social media assumed that Foxx’s words had an antisemitic meaning, attributing his use of "they" as a reference to the Jewish people. 

One, a journalist and self-described Zionist named Eve Barlow blasted Foxx’s words on Twitter, writing, "I am a Jewish advocate who fights antisemitism. Jamie Foxx’s post was a horrifically antisemitic message rooted in classic blood libel and anti-Jewish conspiracy theory. He has 16.7 million followers. I’m not waiting on him to further expand."

Executive editor of Jewish outlet "Jewish Insider," Melissa Weiss assumed the post was antisemitic as well, tweeting, "Seeing someone like Jamie Foxx post antisemitic content is a sad reminder that Jews can’t just exist like most everyone else. There will always be people who hate us."

Jamie Foxx clarified that his tweet was in no way intended to be derogatory to the Jewish people and was just him venting about a "fake friend." (Frazer Harrison)

The account for a Jewish author and attorney @HowardA_AtLaw added, "Just once I’d like to log onto this site and not see antisemitism, especially from huge celebrities like Jamie Foxx and Jennifer Aniston. You don’t want to be an ally, fine, but leave us the heck alone!"

The account had noticed that "Friends" actress Jennifer Aniston "liked" Foxx’s post. 

Once users started attributing antisemitism to it, Aniston posted a message to her own Instagram, "I do NOT support any form of antisemitism. And I truly don’t tolerate HATE of any kind. Period."

Others disagreed with the antisemitic reading of Foxx’s message. Political commentator Anthony Brian Logan tweeted, "Jamie Foxx did not say anything antisemitic. The problem is that some people felt like he was talking about them when referencing the people who killed Jesus. Guilty conscious."

Another user added that the accusations represented "an incredibly uncharitable reading given Jamie Foxx has just passed through a health scare in which people close to him were selling misinformation that he was on his death bed and what not."

Foxx deleted the post once the backlash ensued and shortly followed it with a post apologizing for the original and clarifying that it was not meant to be antisemitic. 

He wrote, "Hey guys. I want to apologize to the Jewish community and anyone else who was offended by my post… I know my words were clumsy and have caused offense… that was never my intent… to clarify… I felt betrayed by a fake friend… and that’s what I meant about ‘they’ nothing more…"

The actor continued, saying, "I have love in my heart for everyone. I support the Jewish community and all faiths… and I’m against all hate! Once again my deepest apologies.

Fox News Digital reached out to representatives for Foxx for comment. They responded with a link to the then-just-published Instagram apology.

For more Culture, Media, Education, Opinion, and channel coverage, visit foxnews.com/media 

Video

Gabriel Hays is an associate editor for Fox News Digital.

 

 

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/bombshell-pfizer-spokesperson-admits-during-australian-senate-hearing/ 

BOMBSHELL: Spokesperson Admits During Australian Senate Hearing that Pfizer Employees Were Given Special Batch of Vaccine, Different from What was Distributed to Public (VIDEO)

by Jim Hᴏft Aug. 4, 2023 12:35 pm204 Comments

In a shocking revelation during a Senate hearing in Australia, a Pfizer spokesperson revealed that the pharmaceutical giant had imported a special batch of COVID-19 vaccines solely for their employee vaccination program.

The admission came during a rigorous questioning session on Wednesday, in which Pfizer Australia’s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and Head of Regulatory Sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, spoke before the Australian Senate’s ‘Education and Employment Legislation Committee’ about the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led the interrogation with forceful inquiries regarding Pfizer’s potential involvement in the introduction of vaccine mandates for employment in Australia.

Senator Roberts, in his questioning, alleged a significant transfer of wealth from the Australian people to Big Pharma via the government’s Covid-19 mismanagement.

He sought clarity on Pfizer’s role in implementing vaccine mandates for employment and their participation in potential government bans on alternative treatments such as Ivermectin.

“Pfizer has no involvement, had no involvement in the imposition of vaccine mandates… Pfizer has had no involvement in relation to Ivermectin,” said Dr. Thiru.

The inquiry took a contentious turn when Roberts probed into Pfizer’s confidential indemnity agreements with the Australian government, suggesting that the taxpayers who funded the vaccine have the right to see the details of what they bought.

“Does the indemnity you have with the government extend to providing you with indemnity in the situation where an employee is forced by their employer to undergo vaccination and then experiences harm? And if you do have indemnity, I want the proof,” Roberts asked.

Dr. Thiru maintained that the specifics of these agreements remain confidential, per standard practice for contractual arrangements between the government and private organizations.

“Senator, any indemnity agreements between Pfizer and the Australian government are confidential and we are not able to discuss that in this forum,” said Thiru.

“Why are they confidential? Because as a taxpayer, I paid for those injections even though I didn’t take any. Why are they confidential? From taxpayers, 26 million Australians. What are you hiding?” Roberts asked.

Roberts also queried about Pfizer’s own employee vaccination program, which Dr. Thiru confirmed was active and conducted in alignment with public health guidance, allowing accommodations or exemptions for those with specific medical or religious reasons for not being vaccinated. He did, however, acknowledge that a small number of colleagues departed the company in light of this program.

Roberts then questioned Pfizer’s use of a specific batch of vaccine for their employees that was not tested by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), to which Dr. Hewitt CLAIMED that this was done to ensure that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks.

“We’ve read that your vaccine mandate was using your own batch of vaccine, especially imported for Pfizer, which was not tested by the TGA. Is that correct?” Roberts asked.

Dr. Hewitt then responded, “So Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccine specifically for the employee vaccination programme, and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that was being delivered to clinics as needed.”

WATCH:

Roberts then asked, “Does your contract with the government for supply of COVID injections include a clause that negates your indemnity in the event of Pfizer committing a crime such as fraudulent treatment of trial data? The question is simple. What is the answer? Yes or no?”

Dr. Thiru was unable to provide a definitive response when questioned about whether Pfizer’s contract with the Australian government included clauses that would nullify their indemnity in the event of “fraudulent treatment of trial data.”

“Senator Roberts, as I had mentioned previously, the contents of Pfizer’s contract with the Australian government remains confidential, and I don’t have any information that I can provide to the Committee in relation to that,” Thiru said.

Roberts’ suspicion extended to the origins of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, questioning whether it was initially developed as a countermeasure for the American Department of Defence. Dr. Thiru responded, emphasizing the vaccine’s development was solely aimed at combating the global public health emergency resulting from the pandemic.

In a Twitter post, Roberts wrote:

Watch as I question Pfizer representatives last night in a Senate Hearing.

The company was very reluctant to attend the committee hearing and also reluctant to supply a straight answer, automatically falling back on their ‘safe and effective’ mantra to dodge answering the question.

Already, this Senate Hearing revealed that Pfizer is rewriting history on transmission of infection. We’re supposed to conveniently forget they said “get it to protect others, to save grandma” and “when you’re vaccinated the virus stops with you”.

They’re hiding behind their indemnity contract with our government and dodging responsibility.

ATAGI and the Australian governments must stop pushing these unsafe and ineffective shots and drop the destructive mandates now.

WATCH:

Submit additional information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

......

 

 

Protect your FREEDOMS.... once they take them away... you will NEVER get them back.

 

 

 

 

Look what has happened so far.... we are giving up our RIGHTS.

 

What will your FUTURE family have?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

......

 

 

 

 

 

.......

DO NOT follow any links I have posted !!

 

 

 

 

.......

 

 

 

 

I will explain soon 

 

 

...

 

 

 

(Finally SMART ADULTS willing to do research. THIS GROUP MATTERS)

 

 

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/black-american-trump-supporters-blast-corrupt-jack-smith/

Blacks for Trump Blasts Corrupt Jack Smith, Biden, and Obama – Accuses Trio of Treason – Calls Jack Smith a ‘Punk’ and ‘Ugly Sellout’ (VIDEO)

by Jim Hᴏft Aug. 3, 2023 8:13 pm314 Comments

Trump was indicted this week on felony charges alleging that he tried to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The bogus indictment comes as a result of an investigation conducted by special counsel Jack Smith, who previously indicted Trump in a separate case involving classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

Trump’s legal team presented their initial arguments. The arraignment is a formal reading of the charges, and Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges.

 

In a passionate display of support for former President Donald Trump, crowds gathered outside a courthouse Thursday where the ex-president was facing ongoing legal scrutiny.

 

 

 

Among these supporters, a particularly vocal black man eloquently expressed his loyalty to Trump and his condemnation of those who opposed the former president unfairly.

“I’m here to support Trump,” he said.

As others joined him, the conversation quickly turned to heated remarks about injustices and anger towards Jack Smith.

 

 

 

“So I’m here to show Jack Smith that he’s a punk and that he’s an ugly sellout,” he added.

“That’s right,” said others.

His passion only grew as he spoke about Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and others for opposing Trump without justification. The supporters likened their actions to a historical practice of parading kings in handcuffs, an act meant to humiliate.

“And I’m here to let [Smith] know that he’s going to jail for treason. Him, Biden, and Obama, and all of the other s*ckers that are going against Trump for no reason.”

 

 

 “I’m here to humiliate you because you are a sellout, and you are a person that is evil, breaking every rule and law,” he added.

The Black supporters then turned their attention to the unequal application of the law, particularly citing Hunter Biden as an example.

“This dude is free to snort coke on camera, get guns, break every rule and law, don’t pay taxes. They don’t even want to put him in jail.”

“But if I did it, you’re going to jail for 9,216 years. That’s unfair, because you know what that is?”

 

“Exodus 12:49, the bible said there should be one law for all, as does the 14th amendment.”

“So I’m here to make sure, give me my right, give me liberty, or give you “DEATH,” the group said in chorus.

 

 

WATCH:

(He said on video....Watch Democrats screaming that white suprematists support Trump. “I’m here to show Jack Smith that he’s a punk and he’s ugly sellout.”)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.....

 

....

 

 

 

Oh my God read this)....Filmmaker says she 'walked away' from Lizzo's documentary because the singer was 'arrogant, self-centered, and unkind'

 

( You're either Classy or Trashy. Money can't buy it)

 

 

 

 https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/filmmaker-says-she-walked-away-105902260.html

 

Filmmaker says she 'walked away' from Lizzo's documentary because the singer was 'arrogant, self-centered, and unkind'

Updated Wed, August 2, 2023 at 9:23 AM EDT

Lizzo.Getty/Matt Jelone

• A filmmaker said she walked away from Lizzo's documentary because she was treated with "disrespect."

• Sophia Nahli Allison wrote in a statement that the singer was "arrogant, self-centered, and unkind."

• Three dancers filed a lawsuit against Lizzo on accusations of body-shaming and sexual harassment.

A filmmaker says she "walked away" from directing a documentary about Lizzo because of how the singer treated her.

Sophia Nahli Allison, an Oscar-nominated filmmaker from Los Angeles, wrote on Twitter on Tuesday that Lizzo demonstrated an "abuse of power" during their brief time together.

Allison's tweet comes after three of Lizzo's former backup dancers filed a lawsuit against the pop star on accusations of body-shaming and sexual harassment.

Lizzo hasn't responded publicly to the lawsuit or Allison's comments. Her representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"In 2019, I traveled a bit with Lizzo to be the director of her documentary. I walked away after 2 weeks. I was treated with such disrespect by her," Allison wrote.

"I witnessed how arrogant, self-centered, and unkind she is," she said. "I was not protected and thrown into a shitty situation with little support. My spirit said to run as fast as you fucking can and I'm so grateful I trusted my gut."

Allison added that she felt "gaslit" and "deeply hurt" by Lizzo, but she did not specify what happened between her and the star.

"Reading these reports made me realize how dangerous of a situation it was," she wrote of the lawsuit filed against the singer.

—Sophia Nahli Allison (@SophiaNAllison) August 1, 2023

 

Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams, and Noelle Rodriguez filed a lawsuit against Lizzo, her production company, Big Grrrl Big Touring, and a member of Lizzo's dance team in Los Angeles County Superior Court on Tuesday.

In the suit, the three dancers accused the singer of sexually harassing them during a night out at a nude club in Amsterdam after they were hired onto Lizzo's dance team.

The lawsuit alleged that Lizzo "began inviting cast members to take turns touching the nude performers, catching dildos launched from the performers' vaginas, and eating bananas protruding from the performers' vaginas" while at the club.

The suit also alleged that Lizzo started a group chant calling out Davis and "pressuring" her to touch a performer's breasts, even after Davis declined multiple times.

"Everything she stands for, she's the complete opposite of that," Rodriguez told Insider of Lizzo.

Read the original article on Insider

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.....

 

Please please answer this question for me because someone is screwing with my blog

 

 

Why and how and WHO can remove things from my post ???

Photos are missing... posts are missing...and posts have been altered.

Please answer me I really don't know.

 

I will NOT BE POSTING anymore news stories or links and please IGNORE the links I HAVE Posted for you to follow. 

DO NOT GO THERE !!!