BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
Allegedly Deaf Transgender LGBTQ Activist Charged with Murdering His Husband With a Samurai Sword
by Cullen Linebarger1 CommentJoanna Rowland-Stuart Credit: The Daily Mail
A 70-year-old transgender LGBTQ activist from the United Kingdom stands accused of murdering his husband in an unusual fashion.
Police say that Joanna Rowland-Stuart, a biological male who
identifies as female, killed his husband, Andrew, at their home in
Brighton Monday evening. The BBC reported that he appeared before magistrates in Crawley on Friday.
Rowland-Stuart, who claims he’s deaf, confirmed his identity through a sign language interpreter after being arrested according to the Daily Mail.
The Mail reported that emergency services responded to an incident at
the 15th-floor flat on Lavender Street in Brighton at approximately
7:30 PM on Monday, May 27. Police officers discovered Andrew dead at the
scene.
Andrew Rowland-Stuart Credit: The Daily Mail
The officers revealed that Andrew was killed by a samurai sword, not
exactly an ordinary weapon of choice. It is not known at this point
whether the suspect is a fan of Japanese culture.
Detective Chief Inspector Alex Campbell of the Surrey and Sussex Major Crime Team, released the following statement in response to the incident:
This is a fast-moving investigation, and our inquiries
are ongoing as we seek to establish the full circumstances which led to
Andrew’s tragic death.
Our thoughts remain with his loved ones at this difficult time.
In the meantime, we are urging the public not to speculate, but to
come forward with any information which may be able to assist us.
Sussex Police have also asked individuals with information on the incident to contact their Major Incident Portal or the independent charity Crimestoppers anonymously.
The Mail reports Rowland-Stuart has been ordered to appear again in Crown Court on June 3.
(Go to the link above to read The truth and stories you won't see on local news and social media.)
Officials Identify Minneapolis Mass Shooting Suspect
by Sharika Soal43 CommentsMustafa Ahmed Mohamed /Sherburne County Sheriff
A convicted felon who was banned from possessing firearms shot and killed a Minneapolis police officer this week.
Saturday afternoon, the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office identified Mustafa Ahmed Mohamed, 35.
Yahoo News reports,
Mohamed died from multiple gunshot wounds Thursday night outside an apartment complex on Blaisdell Avenue South.
The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has not identified Mohamed as the shooter.
However, police have previously said the suspect died at the scene
shortly after ambushing and killing Minneapolis Police Officer Jamal
Mitchell in the street.
Jamal Mitchell was shot by a wounded man he was rushing to save, according to news reports. (@MinneapolisPD / X screenshot)
Mohamed was convicted of felony burglary in 2008. Court records show he had an active warrant for his arrest.
Mohamed was convicted on federal charges in 2016 of being a felon in possession of ammunition, according to court records.
The shooting happened just after 5 p.m. Thursday night on the 2200 block of Blaisdell Avenue South.
The shooting took place at an apartment complex and two additional
people were injured. As a result of multiple gunshot wounds, Mitchell,
32, passed away.
An additional person was wounded after being shot outside the apartment complex.
As police were responding to the shooting, Mitchell was ambushed while trying to help a potential victim.
“What I can tell you is that Officer Mitchell was attempting to
assist the individual that shot him,” BCA Superintendent Drew Evans said
at a press conference Thursday night.
As a result of the shooting, both an officer and a firefighter were injured. They have since been discharged from the hospital.
(Because this president does NOT care about those suffering DAILY)
Inexcusable: Biden’s Pentagon “Mistakenly” Celebrates LGBTQ Pride Month in a PTSD Awareness Social Media Post
by Cullen Linebarger4 CommentsOfficial Department of Defense Seal. Credit: United States Department of Defense
Biden’s Department of Defense (DoD) made an inexcusable error on Saturday when the agency “mistakenly” mixed up LGBTQ Pride Month and PTSD Awareness Month in a social media post.
The Pentagon posted on X Saturday explaining that June marks PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) Awareness Month. As Fox News notes, this was first recognized by the U.S. government in June 2014, one year before June also officially became Pride Month.
“June is PTSD Awareness Month and the DoD is committed to supporting
service members and veterans affected by PTSD,” the DOD post read.
The post continued, “If you or someone you know is struggling, help is available. You are not alone.”
However, there was one big problem with the tweet: the picture
attached below the words in the post read “Celebrate Pride Month 2024”
complete with a Progress Pride Flag photo.
LOOK:
Credit: @DeptofDefense
The Pentagon X account later deleted the post and replaced it with one that had a proper photo.
X users made sure to remind Biden’s Pentagon that the Internet is forever, however.
This error by the Pentagon brings to mind another disgraceful episode
back on March 30. As the Gateway Pundit’s Cassandra MacDonald reported, Joe Biden issued a White House proclamation declaring EASTER SUNDAY to be “Transgender Day of Visibility.”
The Biden regime refused to apologize for this outrageous assault on Christianity. Instead, Joe Biden posted an in-your-face statement on Easter Sunday (March 31) supporting Transgender Day of Visibility.
City Scolded for Banning Chaplains from Praying ‘In Jesus Name’
by Guest Contributor10 Comments
This article originally appeared on WND.com
Guest by post by Bob Unruh
Official claimed petitions to God were ‘harassment’
Members of the city council in Carlsbad, California, have been scolded for insisting that a chaplain who has prayed “in
Jesus’ name” is guilty of harassment.
It is First Liberty Institute that has sent a letter to the council
members urging them to revoke an order from their city manager that
“forbids police chaplain JC Cooper and fire chaplain Denny Cooper from
concluding prayers at some events ‘in Jesus’ name.'”
“The city council should follow the Supreme Court’s clear statements
with respect to prayers such as the chaplains’ and allow them to pray
according to their sincere religious beliefs,” explained Kayla Toney,
counsel for First Liberty.
The institute explained that JC Cooper is a local pastor who has
faithfully served as a volunteer chaplain for the Carlsbad police agency
for six years. His father, Denny Cooper, has served as the volunteer
chaplain for the fire department for 18 years.
Both provide support, encouragement, and prayer to first responders as they face traumatic situations, the institute said.
“When asked by the police chief to give the invocation at the
Carlsbad Police Department Awards Ceremony, JC concluded his prayer,
consistent with his long-held beliefs, ‘in Jesus’ name.’ He was later
told by the city manager that unless he removed ‘in Jesus’ name’ from
his invocation, he would be subject to discipline. He was then told that
he could refer to any other name for God, just not ‘Jesus,'” the
institute said.
The letter recommending a course correction for the city noted, “The
city manager misunderstands the law concerning public chaplains and
invocations, and we urge the city council to revisit the decision to
censor the chaplains’ prayers. The First Amendment’s Establishment
Clause does not require government ‘to purge from the public sphere
anything an objective observer could reasonably infer endorses or
partakes of the religious.'”
The letter explains in the Kennedy v. Bremerton decision, the Supreme
Court overruled the long-criticized ‘endorsement’ test established in
the now-defunct Lemon decision, instead providing, “the Establishment
Clause must be interpreted by reference to historical practices and
understandings.”
The letter to the city explains it is city manager Scott Chadwick who
“claimed that invoking ‘Jesus’ was considered harassment, created aa
hostile work environment, and lifted one religion above another.”
The legal team explained, “Dating back to the Continental Congress in
1776, the United States has a robust and widely recognized tradition of
both public prayer and chaplain programs. The court has explicitly held
that governmental bodies may begin their meetings or other events with a
prayer or invocation. … While such prayers or invocations may not
proselytize or disparage other faiths, chaplains do not have to scrub
their prayers of language identifiable to their faith.
“Government should not censor prayers in an attempt to make them
‘generic’ or ‘nonsectarian.’ … Indeed, in an increasingly diverse and
pluralistic environment, it would be ‘daunting, if not impossible,’ to
write an invocation that would be ‘inclusive beyond dispute,’ nor does
the Constitution require anything of the sort—and ‘some may feel that
they cannot in good faith deliver such a vague prayer.'”
Emboldened by Hamas and Iran’s Ayatollah, Students for Justice in Palestine Announce Plans to ‘Beseige’ White House
by Margaret Flavin72 Comments
Emboldened by support from leaders of the terrorist Hamas
organization and Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, several chapters of
Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) have announced plans to travel
to Washington D.C. to “surround the White House.”
SJP shared their plans on Instagram:
June 8 marks eight months of US-Israeli genocide of the
Palestinian people, and marks the 54th anniversary of the occupation of
Gaza.
A month ago, Biden said that the invasion of Rafah was a red line.
But now, the invasion of Rafah has continued for weeks, has expanded to
the entire Gaza Strip, and Biden’s red line is nowhere to be seen.
Instead of following through and stopping military aid to Israel, Biden
has authorized billions MORE in weapons shipments to be used to kill and
massacre Palestinians.
Biden can’t draw the line, but we have. On June 8, we’ll come
together from across the country and surround the White House. Wearing
red, and raising our demands high, we’ll show the world that we are the
red line.
Busses from Raleigh will be meeting at 7AM! Link in our bio for more info.
CEASEFIRE NOW. END THE SIEGE ON GAZA. FREE THE PALESTINIAN PRISONERS.
END THE OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE. on social media announcing the June 8
plans.
The flyer accompanying the post says, “Biden, we are your red line. Stop the genocide. Surround the White House!”
The ANSWER Coalition and Peoples Forum NYC shared that buses are being
made available for transportation to the event from all over the
country, including Dearborn, Michigan; Des Moines, Iowa; Portland,
Maine; and more.
The actions have the full support of terrorists and brutal regime leaders.
The Gateway Pundit reported
that senior Hamas official Khaled Mashal officially thanked student
protesters at American universities for their protests and anti-Israel
encampments and for their participation in the “Al-Aqsa Flood” war.
A translation of his remarks was provided by the Middle East Media Research Institute.
Mashal said, “We thank the great student Flood, which emerged from
the American, European, and Western universities, and has reached all
the countries of our nation. We are grateful for the spirit that we have
witnessed in our nation and in humanity as a whole. We are grateful to
the free people of the world.”
“We have an opportunity to defeat Israel, Allah willing. We have an
opportunity to dismantle the Zionist enterprise. We have an opportunity
to change the world.”
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei also shared his support of the protestors in a letter posted a letter online:
“Dear university students in the United States of America, you are
standing on the right side of history. You have now formed a branch of
the Resistance Front and have begun an honorable struggle in the face of
your government’s ruthless pressure – which openly supports
Zionists…Dear university students in the US, my advice to you is to
become familiar with the Quran.”
(to read the complete story go to the link at the top)
White House Admits in
Federal Court They ‘Doctored’ Joe Biden’s Special Counsel Testimony
Transcript to Make Him Appear Less Incompetent: Report
by Jim Hᴏft191 CommentsPhoto: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images
Recent bombshell revelations have emerged, exposing the White House’s
admission in federal court to altering the transcript of Joe Biden’s
testimony with Special Counsel Robert Hur.
These blatant alterations were made to artificially inflate Biden’s
competence during his five-hour interrogation about his mishandling of
classified documents.
Earlier this year, Washington Post reporter Matt Viser revealed that Special Counsel Robert Hur concluded that Joe Biden recklessly mishandled sensitive materials discovered at his home and former office.
Disturbingly, the investigation also uncovered that Biden shared
government secrets with his ghostwriter, further underscoring his
blatant disregard for national security.
Adding to this damning report, it was revealed that during interviews with the Special Counsel, Biden struggled to answer even basic questions, such as when he served as Vice President or the year his son Beau passed away from brain cancer.
However, the DOJ opted not to bring charges against Biden, citing
concerns that a jury would deem him too mentally incompetent to stand
trial.
The damning report reads, in part:
In his interview with our office, Mr. Biden’s memory was
worse. He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the
first day of the interview when his term ended (“if it was 2013 – when
did I stop being Vice President?”), and forgetting on the second day of
the interview when his term began (“in 2009, am I still Vice
President?”). He did not remember, even within several years, when his
son Beau died.
And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan
debate that was once so important to him. Among other things, he
mistakenly said he “had a real difference” of opinion with General Karl
Eikenberry when, in fact, Eikenberry was an ally whom Mr. Biden cited
approvingly in his Thanksgiving memo to Barack Obama.
We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely
present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a
sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.
It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him
— by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious
felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”
The White House confronted a critical decision about releasing the
interview transcript. Biden’s legal team contended that Hur’s references
to Biden’s memory issues during the interview were misleading and
unfairly prejudicial.
Joe Biden attacked Robert Hur during an impromptu presser after the report was released.
“There is even a reference that I don’t remember when my son died. How in the hell dare he raise that?” Biden previously told reporters in
an impromptu White House press conference. “Frankly, when I was asked
the question, I thought to myself, it wasn’t any of their damn
business.”
In March, Republicans planned to hold U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for the Justice Department’s refusal to release the audio recordings of Joe Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur.
“The House Oversight and Judiciary Committees issued lawful subpoenas
to Attorney General Garland for the audio recordings of President
Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Hur, yet he continues to defy our
subpoenas,” House Oversight Chairman James Comer said in a statement.
“These audio recordings are important to our investigation of President
Biden’s willful retention of classified documents and his fitness to be
President of the United States.”
But White House counsel Ed Siskel lashed out at the House GOP in an angry letter, accusing them of only wanting the recordings “to chop them up” and use them for political reasons.
“The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare
your likely goal — to chop them up, distort them, and use them for
partisan political purposes,” Ed Siskel wrote.
He added, “Demanding such sensitive and constitutionally protected
law enforcement materials from the Executive Branch because you want to
manipulate them for potential political gain is inappropriate.”
However, new revelations revealed that the White House admitted to
altering the transcript of Joe Biden’s testimony to the Special Counsel
to make him appear less incompetent.
This not-so-shocking admission comes on the heels of a lawsuit filed
by the Heritage Foundation and Judicial Watch against the US Department
of Justice, demanding the release of the original recording of Biden’s
testimony.
Unsurprisingly, Biden’s allies within the
Justice Department have vehemently opposed this filing, aiming to delay
or even prevent its release until after the upcoming election, according
to Oversight Project, launched by The Heritage Foundation in January
2022, which aims to increase aggressive oversight of the Biden
administration and its policies.
Mike Howell, Executive Director of the Heritage Oversight Project, expressed disappointment but not surprise at these delaying tactics.
“While we are disappointed with the Court’s decision, we appreciate
the prompt and careful thought the Court is devoting to this case,” he
said. “The real question is why are we in court at all? This tape
belongs to the American people and there is no legitimate argument to
not give it to them.”
“The idea that the DOJ needs months to send over a recording is
absurd on its face. They should save the taxpayers millions of dollars
in legal fees and just hit the send button. Instead, President Biden is
having his Richard Nixon moment. If he wants to drag this out then it
just means this chapter of corruption will be even longer,” he added.
President Biden has personally invoked Executive Privilege
against The Heritage Foundation and Judicial Watch in an attempt to
keep his controversial interview with Special Counsel Hur under wraps.
Now, with the White House admitting to doctoring the transcript, the
case has been blown wide open, according to the organization.
“WHITE HOUSE ADMITS THEY DOCTORED BIDEN’S CRIMINAL TRANSCRIPT,” the Oversight Project wrote.
“After being forced into Federal court by us, the White House admits
they altered evidence to make Biden appear less incompetent. This case
has been blown wide open,” it added.
According to the court filing:
“The interview transcripts are accurate transcriptions of
the words of the interview contained in the audio recording, except for
minor instances such as the use of filler words (such as “um” or “uh”) when speaking that are not always reflected on the transcripts, or when words may have been repeated when spoken (such as “I, I” or “and, and”‘) but sometimes was only listed a single time in the transcripts.
Besides these exceedingly minor differences, based
on my simultaneous review of the transcripts while listening to the
audio recording, the transcripts accurately capture the words spoken
during the interview on the audio recording with no material differences
between the audio recording and transcripts. None of the minor
differences include any audible substantive exchanges – that is, based
on my review, there is no material omission of words between the audio
recording and transcripts.
Special Counsel Hur and FBI personnel who attended the interview and
compared the audio recording to the transcripts also informed me of
their determination that the transcripts accurately reflect the words
spoken on the audio recording aside from the minor instances I described
above. Special Counsel Hur emphasized to me that it was important for
purposes of his investigation that the interview transcripts be
accurate.”
