BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
Violent Transgender Person
Pays a Fatal Price After Marching Toward Denver Police Officers and
Threatening Them with a Knife (VIDEO)
by Cullen Linebarger697 CommentsCredit: Denver Police Department
Police bodycam footage released
late last week shows the moment a violent transgender person was gunned
down by Denver police after ignoring several commands to surrender and
threatening them with a knife.
The Denver Gazette revealed
Tuesday that the shooting happened on June 16 at around 11:30 a.m. at
the intersection of Broadway and Lawrence Street in Colorado’s capital
city. Police officers responded to someone standing in the intersection,
telling passing motorists to hit him.
The person killed in the shooting was 52-year-old Miguel Tapia. Police identified Tapia as transgender.
Denver cops previously mistakenly identified him as a woman.
In the bodycam footage released by the Denver Police Department
(DPD), one of the officers can be heard telling Tapia to “put his stuff
down and his hands on his head.” The perp defies the officer’s commands.
The cop and two of his fellow officers exit their vehicles with
pointed tasers. Tapia responds to the officers by yelling at them in
Spanish and marching toward them while holding a bag in each hand.
Another officer tells Tapia in Spanish to surrender, which he again
ignores. Roughly 15 seconds later, the suspect puts his bookbag on his
shoulder and pulls out a knife with an eight-inch blade from his
waistband.
Tapia then approaches the cops. Two officers fire three Taser
cartridges at the thug in self-defense, but this does not deter him.
With their options dwindling, the three cops pull out their handguns
and unload 12 rounds at Tapia. He falls to the ground in a heap.
The Denver Gazette reports
police called for an ambulance and began rendering aid after Tapia
fell. He was pronounced dead on the scene and later identified by the
Office of the Medical Examiner.
Denver Police Chief Ron Thomas told
reporters that the perp’s ‘gender identity’ played no role in their
actions. Instead, the police response was solely based on the suspect’s
criminal behavior.
“We have discovered the person was transgendered, and there was a
belief that the person was houseless, but that did not factor into our
decision,” Thomas explained.
“What factored into our decision was the person had a knife and was moving aggressively toward the officers,” he added.
Denver 7 News reports two of the officers who fired weapons were patrol officers while the third was a sergeant who started with DPD in 2001.
According to
Denver 7 News, the heroic cops have been placed on a modified duty
status while they complete DPD’s reintegration program and the
investigation unfolds. The Colorado Bureau of Investigation and the
Colorado State Patrol are investigating the matter.
The outlet notes
their findings will be overseen by the Office of Independent Monitor
which will then turn them over to the Denver District Attorney’s Office.
(If Democrats stay if office this might happen in ALL States.WILL YOU want to pay for them for YOUR entire LIFE)
Mayor Adams’ Budget Pushes Permanent Taxpayer-Funded Spending for ‘Migrant Crisis’
by Sharika Soal284 CommentsMayor Eric Adams/ Credit Robert Miller
These people are bold.
In an underhanded tactic, Mayor Eric Adams
has introduced a never-ending funding strategy for the so-called
‘migrant crisis’ into his budget, ensuring that taxpayers will foot the
bill indefinitely.
This under-the-radar move ensures a permanent financial drain on city
resources, prioritizing endless spending on illegal migrants over the
needs of hardworking citizens.
The New York Post reports,
Gotham’s budget might be late, with City Council Speaker
Adrienne Adams warning last week that she and Mayor Adams (no relation)
will miss this Sunday’s fiscal-year deadline.
But the timing of the budget is less important than the substance.
The council and the mayor are arguing over tidbits while missing the
big chunk of spending obscuring New York’s future: How much can we
realistically spend on migrants?
In his budget proposal, the mayor has finally admitted to reality — the migrant “crisis” is here to stay.
This is a reality that he helped create, by continuing to offer all
migrants, including single young men with no credible claims to
political asylum, at least 30 to 60 days of city-paid shelter.
And the city is now institutionalizing this “crisis” as a permanent part of city government.
In an announcement on Tuesday, the mayor revealed that the city would
refrain from taking on so many no-bid contracts for “emergencies.”
Instead, he would begin a competitive selection process for managing
illegal immigrant hotels and shelters and providing migrant services.
As migrants continue to flock to New York, the city will keep opening shelters for them.
The city will sign contracts with various vendors for at least a year
apiece, and “possibly additional sites” will be added to the city’s
hundreds of migrant shelters.
And the services the city will ask these contractors to provide are comprehensive.
Under its official “right to shelter”
pledge, the city has legally bound itself to handing out shelter and
food. This voluntary scheme has stuck them with court-mandated
obligations that cater to those seeking a free ride.
And it doesn’t stop there. Over the past two years, NYC has steadily
added more freebies, which are becoming the norm rather than the
exception.
Between project managers, case managers, security guards,
food servers and laundry providers, New York City is building up a
mini-economy of thousands of contract workers and hundreds of vendors,
all of whom depend on this “crisis” persisting.
Not to mention all the owners of B- and C-grade hotels and vacant office space, happy to have a long-term customer.
And now, the city will ask vendors to provide 30% of their
subcontracts to minority- and women-owned businesses, creating a broader
constituency in favor of a permanent migrant “crisis.”
As we enter this “next phase,” as the city puts it, spending on
migrants is already rising to $4.7 billion annually for the 2025 fiscal
year that starts Monday, up $1 billion from the current year.
Expecting taxpayers to fork over 5 billion dollars a year for illegal
immigrants wanting a free ride while Americans deal with crime and
government corruption is wild.
News
media doesn't want you to see these stories... pass it on and go to the
link above to read more TRUE stories that they don't want you to see
Explosive Study Once Removed
by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of
Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot
by Jim Hᴏft422 Comments
A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.
The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,”
analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths
were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the
COVID-19 vaccination.
The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant
opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being
downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.
According to The Daily Sceptic,
the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by
Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not
supported by the study methodology.”
The news outlet added:
“Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff
who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that
the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A
number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it
is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so
poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being
subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship
of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the
CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid
mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not
what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”
In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.
“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.
“Incredible perseverence [sic] by first author Nicolas Hulscher who
didn’t give up after LANCET pulled our paper within 24 hours after
100,000s of downloads for no legitimate reason. Big pharma put the
squeeze on The Lancet but has failed to stop us.”
“Our paper was delayed by one year, and those actions of CENSORSHIP
and CANCELLATION led to many deaths that could have been prevented. This
paper could be a game changer,” Makis added.
According to the study:
Methods
We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and
necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. All autopsy and necropsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included.
Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the
original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case
and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct
cause or contributed significantly to death.
Results
We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our
inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases
and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years.
The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular
(49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple
organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21
cases.
The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration.
A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated
as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19
vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include
sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial
infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem
inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).
According to the VAERS COVID Adverse Event Reports
that track all of the COVID-reported vaccine deaths and complications,
37,647 people have died from the COVID-19 vaccine – as of May 31, 2024.
These are the vaccine-related deaths that were reported.
And still, doctors are pushing the vaccine on their patients! The money must be very, very good!
Another COVID “conspiracy theory” becomes reality as a bombshell study CENSORED by The Lancet has now been peer-reviewed.
What were they trying to hide, you ask?
Lots and lots of vaccine deaths.
After analyzing 325 COVID vaccine autopsy cases, the now
peer-reviewed study found that “a total of 240 deaths, which is 73.9%,
were independently adjudicated as DIRECTLY DUE to or significantly
contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”
