BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
(That state has a gov that is so evil and shady. Do your research and see the NUTS that are running for office there.
They have ALWAYS BEEN crooked !!!!)
HUGE! Breaking Project
Veritas VIDEO… Top Dems Reveal How They Steal Elections in
Muslim-Majority MI City — Former Mayor Claims AG Nessel Has Been
Investigating— Ballots Allegedly Being Filled Out in Dining Rooms!
by Patty McMurray0 Comments
A
new video has just been released by Project Veritas revealing a
stunning voter fraud operation in the densely populated Wayne County,
MI, city of Hamtramck—the first city in America to have an all-Muslim
government.
Several high-profile members of the Democrat Party in Michigan can be
seen explaining how their fellow Democrats are stealing the vote as
part of a well-oiled operation that the former mayor of Hamtramck claims
MI Democrat AG Dana Nessel and possibly the Feds have been
investigating the alleged criminal operation.
Progressive Democrats, many of whom are part of the LGBT community,
AG Nessel has been very vocal about her attempts to destroy the lives
of 15 MI GOP electors by charging them with 8 felonies each for turning
in an alternate slate of electoral votes for President Trump in the
hotly contested 2020 election. One year ago, The Gateway Pundit broke a
story that was based on a MI State Police report that revealed a
Democrat-funded voter registration group called GBI Strategies was
turning in massive numbers of fake registrations across the state of
Michigan. The registrations were being mailed from a hotel room in
Auburn Hills and from the GBI Strategies headquarters in Southfield. The
Southfield, MI GBI Strategies office was raided, and multiple
semi-automatic rifles with suppressors and modified pistols were found
in the room where workers were performing their “duties.” MI AG Nessel
and MI SOS Jocelyn Benson’s office were directly involved in the
statewide investigation but never mentioned a word to the public about
the shocking evidence they uncovered only one month before the 2020
election.
Now, the former mayor of Hamtramck is claiming that Michigan’s
grotesquely partisan AG is also investigating what appears to be a huge
voter fraud case that could have potentially affected the outcome of the
2020 election.
”Oh yeah, absolutely Nessel’s [MI AG] involved (in investigations)—And I think the Feds are involved!”
Former Democrat Mayor of Hamtramck Karen Majewski
The undercover video begins with an introduction of the outspoken former mayor:
“The absentee ballots are being filled out in people’s
dining rooms by the candidates,” Majewski tells the undercover Project
Veritas reporter
“We have a serious—that’s been going on for 20 years, basically, absentee ballot problem.”
The former mayor explained how Democrats have been able to get away with committing mass voter fraud for decades:
“You need these people’s votes, right? So, who’s going to say brown-skinned people are doing election fraud?”
The Project Veritas narrator introduces the former mayor:
Meet Karen Majewski, who served as Hamchamik’s first
woman mayor from 2005 to 2021, the year she was defeated by her Yemeni
challenger, Amir Ghalib, who himself was historically swept into office
as Hamtramck’s first Muslim mayor, along with America’s first all-Muslim
City Council.
As the consequences of those elections continue to be felt,
locals now fear their once welcoming LGBTQ sanctuary may be lost forever
due to the policies of their newly emboldened all-Muslim leadership.
Hamtramck City Council candidate
Lynn Blasey told the undercover reporter, “They hire black people to go
to black people’s houses. They hire Bangladeshi people to go to
Bangladeshi homes.” She explained, “The black people—they pay them for
their ballots.”
Ms. Blasey then explained how, after the ballots are harvested, they
are offered to the candidates and then auctioned off to the highest
bidder. She refers to the criminal operation as “The Midnight Meeting.”
Watch the undercover video here:
Former Hamtramck City Clerk August Gitschlag, who is now the current
clerk in the city of Fraser, MI, explains how the Democrats use threats
and intimidation to harvest ballots. “Voter fraud happens in small
ethnic communities where someone is more assimilated. They can run the
show—intimidate.” Gitschlag was asked by the reporter, “So, you think
that’s what happened here? He responded, “Oh, it IS what happened here.
Clerk Gitschlag claims MI AG Dana Nessel’s office is “in on them”
(the ballot harvesting scheme), adding, “I got three people busted back
in 2013.”
Gitschlag’s story checks out. In September 2014, three men were,
indeed, charged with a total of 41 counts of improper possession
or return of an absentee ballot, by Republican AG Bill Schuette.
Armani Asad, a City Council candidate, was charged with 14 counts;
Salim Ahmed, 50, with 21 counts; and Russell Mohammed, 32, with six
counts
All three men charged with MULTIPLE felonies that carried up to five years in prison got off with a slap on the wrist.
According to the Hamtramck Review – The four men convicted of illegally handling absentee ballots got off easy.
All four received minor fines and court fees, but they will each have a felony conviction on record for at least five years.
At the end of five years, they will be eligible to have their felony
convictions expunged from their record, and otherwise be considered free
of having a criminal record.
MLive
reported on the former clerk’s role in outing the criminals – “During
the August 2013 primary election, the Hamtramck City Deputy Clerk,
August Gitschlag, found that three unauthorized people had allegedly
delivered multiple absentee ballots in violation of state election law,”
Schuette’s office said in a statement. “It is a felony to possess or
return an absentee ballot unless you are the person voting, the voter’s
family member, a mail carrier, or an authorized official. All Michigan
absentee ballots clearly explain the codified election law regarding the
proper procedure for obtaining, possessing, and processing absentee
ballots.”
They go around the neighborhood with the AB
applications, and they have people sign the application. Then they can’t
have to drop them all off at City Hall. Then they know when they go
out, they go back to the person’s house and say, You sign the envelope,
submit a ballot.
Kamala Campaign Is Paying
Online Influencers and Celebrities $20,000 to Attend the DNC in Chicago –
The DNC Values Their Online Influencers
by Jim Hoft1 Comment
The DNC is paying online influencers to attend their convention this year in Chicago.
The Kamala Campaign is allegedly paying its online influencers and
celebrities $20,000 each to attend the DNC Convention in Chicago in
August.
An email is being sent to their top influencers to pay them to come to the Chicago DNC.
Democrats value their online influencers. And they know they have no
real grassroots support – especially with their weak candidates and
dangerous agenda.
You would think that with the Democrats owning the Marxist media they
would not be so interested in supporting their online personalities.
But that is not true. Democrats understand that paying their online
influencers is an investment.
Republicans don’t see things this way.
Here is a copy of the email that is being sent around.
Via Dom Lucre
Dom Lucre posted this on Sunday.
Dom Lucre released a video on Sunday on this program.
Democrats understand media.
For the record – The Gateway Pundit has been around for nearly 20
years. We can write essays on how the DNC and Republicans support and
value their online influencers.
Go to the link above to read more TRUE stories that local news, social media and some search sites will NOT SHOW YOU.
INGRASSIA: Google Is
Actively Promoting Kamala Harris and Censoring Donald Trump To Create
Astroturfed Narrative That Her Campaign Is Performing Better Than It
Really Is
by Paul Ingrassia48 CommentsA Branco cartoon
Unsurprisingly, Big Tech is once again
repeating their fabled 2020 playbook in boosting the Democrat over the
Republican in this year’s presidential race. And of all the companies,
Google has once again been the worst culprit. The Silicon Valley-based
company has spearheaded the charge in trafficking deceptive
misinformation and outright propaganda, pulling all its weight behind
Kamala Harris, and manufacturing a narrative around her that she is
performing far better in the polls and on the campaign trail than
President Trump, which could not be further from the truth.
The idea, however, is to utilize bad-faith actors in Silicon Valley,
like Google, to generate a perception that Kamala Harris’ party has
obtained newfound momentum in the wake of Joe Biden’s ouster from the
contest, the latest any president has dropped out of the race in history
– that has all the signs of an internal coup. Because Biden was
floundering badly before he was forced out, the Democrats resorted to a
last-minute switcheroo, swapping the much younger Harris (59) for the
dementia-ridden Biden (81). The logic was to naturally lull the less
informed into the belief, despite Harris polling historically worse than
Biden all throughout their administration, that somehow this maneuver
would give Democrats a new lease on life, reigniting the Democratic
Party with the momentum to take it home this November – a party that
otherwise looked headed for defeat with Biden atop the ticket. In
politics, perception is all too often reality – and the perception of
Kamala polling more favorably than Biden, even if untrue, can
nevertheless have an impact in politics.
Thus, if a narrative can be contrived around Kamala Harris making a
competitive race of one that just a month ago looked like a guaranteed
Trump victory, that can be sufficient to later sabotage the 45th
President’s campaign with more nefarious tactics, like a repeat of the
same cheat that unjustly blocked him out of a second term four years
ago. Think of it this way: courts are more likely to review evidence in
a time-pressed situation – like the critical days after Election Day –
if the media narrative in the lead-up to November 5th were that Trump
would be facing a deeply flawed candidate like Biden, who despite the
odds pulled out a last-minute “victory” under highly questionable
circumstances. In contrast, if the narrative is that the polls are
close, as is now the case with Kamala Harris, you will be more likely to
confront a 2020-type situation, where courts, especially under a high
duress situation, would be far less receptive to evidence pointing to
election fraud, even when such evidence exists as it did in 2020, if the
mainstream narrative in the lead-up to Election Day was that the race
was tight, as they mainstream media and Big Tech is now signaling.
In that regard, Big Tech – and Google, above all – whose parent company, Alphabet, contributed more money to Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign than any other group
– and was responsible for staffing many high-level positions within the
Biden administration, offers a powerful propaganda arm for Kamala
Harris’ campaign. This is dangerous, and not only because of Google’s
outsized market share for search engines, where it operates as the
textbook case of a Big Tech monopoly and effectively has total control
over all information-flows in the United States. The company thus
stands as a very powerful weapon in the Democratic Party’s arsenal to
manipulate public opinion and craft narratives – either directly via
shadow-banning or censorship, or through subtler means like gaslighting,
and curated search returns, that — for example — select against
headlines that favor Donald Trump over Kamala Harris
Big Tech – and Google, above all – whose parent company, Alphabet, contributed more money to Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign than any other group
– and was responsible for staffing many high-level positions within the
Biden administration, now offers a powerful propaganda arm for the
Kamala Harris “reset.”
Of course, the astroturfed presentation of reality that Google
carefully manufactures has been readily on display for a while now for
the millions of Americans who rely on its search engine regularly for
news and information, and are keenly familiar with the search engine’s
deceptive tactics. Over the past ten years especially, Google has
functioned as an outright propaganda arm for the Democratic Party,
joining its counterparts in cable news (i.e., CNN and MSNBC) and print
publications (i.e., The New York Times and The Washington Post), by
promoting woke holidays through “Google Doodles” while engineering its
search functionality to rewrite history to be in alignment with an ultra
leftist worldview. For example, among the holidays Google chooses to
highlight with a celebratory “doodle” includes Juneteenth, International
Women’s Day, Bastille Day, and “Waitangi Day.”
Among the woke holidays Google chooses to highlight with a
celebratory “doodle” include Juneteenth, International Women’s Day,
Bastille Day, and “Waitangi Day.” Notable omissions are Columbus Day, a
federal holiday, and Easter, one of the most important holidays for
Christians.
It notoriously does not celebrate Easter with a doodle, despite the
overwhelming majority of its American audience being self-identified
Christians. Moreover, it chooses to willfully ignore Columbus Day,
despite being a federal holiday, and when it does honor Christmas,
another federal holiday, it does so only with secular imagery that never
makes any reference to the holiday’s commemoration to the birth of
Jesus. The search engine also actively rewrites history by choosing to
elevate relatively obscure figures, much as it did in 2023 with doodles
paying homage to Adelaide Cabete, Surong Nguyet Anh, and Juntree Siriboonrod,
while ignoring time-honored greats like George Washington, Thomas
Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln. Google would probably retort that its
users are not isolated to the United States, and thus the doodles are
designed to cater to an international audience. Fine. But when was the
last time Google commemorated Mozart, Shakespeare, Da Vinci, Tolstoy,
or Aristotle, all non-Americans but individuals with great impacts on
world history? You’d be hard-pressed to find a doodle that does not
commemorate a member of some historically “oppressed” group, often on
gender and racial lines – or at the bare minimum, in the chance
occurrence Google does celebrate a white man, did not have a politically
liberal ideology or agenda.
The Google Doodle for Christmas: which is completely
secular and devoid of any Christian imagery or symbolism, such as a
cross or manger.
The importance of this discussion on doodles commemorating woke
holidays, people, and causes is that it indicates the company’s broader
commitment to liberalism and a leftist-borderline-Marxist view of
history, one that is outwardly opposed to someone who shares Donald
Trump’s nationalist and conservative worldview, which exalts the figures of our past, and recognizes them – regardless of their flaws – as integral parts to our history and national identity.
In the parlance of American politics, this bias is vindicated by even
just an ancillary perusal of election-related topics. For example, a
Google search of presidential polling would have any uninformed user
believing that Kamala Harris was ahead in the polls, even though Real Clear Politics,
a polling aggregator, still has President Trump in the lead. This
remains true over and above all the media hype that has surrounded
Kamala Harris ever since Biden dropped out.
A Google search for “donald trump polling lead over
kamala harris” yields returns that would have you believe the very
opposite is true: that Kamala Harris is now ahead in the polls, a
falsehood.
How Google presents the latest presidential polling between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
The reality of the latest RCP polling, which, despite all the media-contrived Kamala hype, still gives President Trump a lead.
It is notable that the search returns offer a smorgasbord of
left-leaning outlets, such as CNN and the Washington Post, both of whose
editorial positions are decidedly pro-Harris. But Google’s liberal bias
goes well beyond mere polling. It likewise extends to the framing of
narratives surrounding either candidate. For example, recently
investigative journalist Laura Loomer blew the lid off an explosive story involving an extramarital affair Kamala’s husband, Doug Emhoff, had with his daughter’s nanny,
an elementary school teacher, while still married to his first wife.
Reportedly, Emhoff impregnated the nanny, who allegedly had the child
aborted – which led to the divorce of Emhoff and his first wife.
A quick search of the story is an illuminating case study of how
Google’s search engine operates, working to clean up “bad” information
that might negatively affect Kamala Harris’ campaign. For instance, the
Doug Emhoff affair story was originally published in the Daily Mail –
however, the Daily Mail (nor Laura Loomer, the investigative
journalist who first broke the story) is not included in any of the top
returns for the story.
The Doug Emhoff affair was originally published in the
Daily Mail – however, neither that publication (nor Laura Loomer, the
investigative journalist who first broke the story) is featured in any
of the top search results on Google.
Furthermore, the headlines that are produced from my own Google
search into the story may be classified as being overwhelmingly
apologetic or remorseful in tenor. CNN’s headline says “Emhoff
acknowledges affair during first marriage after tabloid report.” The New York Times similarly reads “Doug Emhoff, Husband of Kamala Harris, Acknowledges Long-Ago Affair.” CBS News’ result says, “Second gentleman Doug Emhoff admits
affair during first marriage.” In nearly every case, Google selects
for headlines using language that sugarcoats what happened, and puts it
in the best possible framing for Kamala Harris – whose name is only
explicitly featured in a handful of the headlines of the top five
returns.
Meanwhile, contrast that with a recent appearance Donald Trump made
at the National Association of Black Journalists Conference in Chicago
last week, an event that elicited a furor media-fabricated controversy
based on a few remarks the President made questioning Harris’ ancestral
background. The returns generated by Google all come from left-leaning
outlets, like CNN and NPR, featuring headlines like “Trump’s hostility
to Black journalists renews questions over how news media should cover
his rhetoric” that are disproportionately negative towards Donald Trump.
The returns generated by Google from President Trump’s
recent visit to the Black Journalists Convention in Chicago virtually
all come from left-leaning outlets, like CNN and NPR, and feature
headlines such as “Trump’s hostility to Black journalists renews
questions over how news media should cover his rhetoric” that disfavor
Donald Trump.
The anti-Trump gaslighting gets even more nefarious when Google
search users attempt to look into President Trump’s recent failed
assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, which occurred less than a
month ago. A Google Search of “Trump assassination attempt” returns
results that frame the near-tragedy in the worst possible light: clearly
showcasing an anti-Trump bias.
The first result preposterously compares the President’s
near-assassination to Benito Mussolini, the Fascist Italian dictator,
while another result, from the anti-Trump Washington Post, reads “Trump
baselessly blames assignation attempt on Democratic messaging.”
Google’s first result preposterously compares the
President’s near-assassination to a piece on Benito Mussolini, the
Fascist Italian dictator, while another result, from the anti-Trump
Washington Post, reads “Trump baselessly blames assignation attempt on
Democratic messaging.”
Even more alarmingly, a “Google Videos” search does not return the
video of that near-assassination attempt on any of its first few pages.
One has to dig for pages and pages to finally produce a result
showcasing the full length uninterrupted video from that day, yet more
evidence of anti-Trump bias. One would expect that the first result to
appear for a search of “trump assassination attempt” would be a video
of, well, that July 13th rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
One has to go for pages and pages on a Google Videos
search to finally produce a result showcasing the full length
uninterrupted video from that day, yet more evidence of Google’s
anti-Trump bias.
I even gave the search engine the benefit of the doubt, and used
Boolean operators like quotation marks — but got the same disappointing
result of no full length videos of the near tragedy in Butler, only
commentaries and soundbites:
What this demonstrates is that Google, the de facto leader of Silicon
Valley’s woke shadow regime, is actively tilting the scales in Kamala
Harris’ favor by gaslighting, memory-holing, and outright censoring
content that would benefit Donald Trump. We conservatives already know
all too well from 2020, that Big Tech is wont to collude to ban
conservative voices, including then President Trump, and stories – such
as the New York Post’s now-infamous Hunter Biden laptop story censure by Facebook, that polling supports would have proven outcome-determinative in swaying the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Google further helps do the Democrats’ bidding by
downplaying the ties far left groups, like BLM and Antifa, have to
Kamala Harris, even though as a senator Kamala Harris was one of BLM’s
most fervent supporters during the peak of the 2020 George Floyd riots,
the most economically destructive riots in American history that resulted in billions of damages nationwide and nearly razed Portland and Minneapolis.
The deeper problem, which was exposed once the Hunter Biden story’s
censure by the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force became widely known,
is the collusion between intelligence and other governmental agencies
and technology companies like Facebook (now Meta) and Google. Case in
point: FBI director Christopher Wray’s recent attempt
to downplay President Trump’s near-assassination. The disgraced FBI
director testified last month before the House Judiciary Committee that
President Trump might have been grazed by shrapnel or glass, and not a bullet,
a completely false reframing of the events of that day. The comments
were widely criticized, no less by the FBI itself, which thereafter
issued an official statement clarifying that “what struck … President
Trump in the ear was a bullet…”. It is obvious why Wray sought to
undermine and gaslight the events of that day: to make President Trump
look less “badass” – in the words of Mark Zuckerberg – because the
iconic image of him standing up and shouting “Fight! Fight! Fight!” is
certainly to the 45th President’s political advantage (and to the detriment of Kamala Harris’) in a hotly contested election cycle.
Moreover, Christopher Wray also sought to duplicitously sow doubts
into the official narrative, making the President seem less brave than
he was, or, in the most cynical interpretation, obliquely green-light
the horrific attempt on the 45th President’s life. Whatever
the motive, Google’s attempt to memory-hole the story must be seen in
tandem with Christopher Wray’s attempt to sow doubts into the official
narrative that President Trump was shot with a bullet. This should be
taken very seriously, especially in light of the well-documented cases
of collusion between the FBI and Big Tech that have occurred for years –
and the ongoing efforts, which remain in effect today, by these two
organizations to quash pro-Trump sentiment and narratives in the lead-up
to a decisive presidential election, where Google, if not all of
Silicon Valley, has clearly made known its preferred candidate this
cycle – and that candidate patently is not Donald Trump.
While Donald Trump has reason to be optimistic that the sentiment has
shifted to some degree in Silicon Valley, with Big Tech gurus like Elon
Musk, David Sacks, and others now coming to his corner – and committing
reportedly tens of millions of dollars behind him this race, there is
still a great deal of sabotage being done behind the scenes – a
conspiracy implicating people nestled in the highest corridors of power
in Washington and Silicon Valley.
It is therefore incumbent that we, the people, continue to hold Big
Tech’s feet to the fire – and use favorable platforms like X, Truth
Social, and Rumble – to continue to highlight Google’s censorship and
gaslighting of conservative voices, and spread the message that the
search engine is not the objective and unbiased tool it pretends to be,
but a devoted foot soldier in the Left’s army committing to rewriting
history and making sure President Trump never sees the inside of the
Oval Office again. Conservatives must call them out for this, notify
lawmakers on Capitol Hill to conduct hearings, and stop Google and Big
Tech’s censorship crusade in their tracks — for the integrity of both
the First Amendment — and a free press — is what is at stake if we fail
to act.
