BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
(Click on the link above for more TRUE stories that they don't want you to see)
Judicial Bombshell:
Federal Judge Forces FDA to Release Over a Million Pages of Pfizer’s
COVID-19 Trial Documents They Wanted to Keep Hidden for 75 Years
by Jim Hᴏft513 Comments
(Photo credit: depositphotos.com)
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
ruled against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a high-profile
case brought by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for
Transparency (PHMPT).
The decision mandates the FDA to release the Emergency Use
Authorization (EUA) file for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine no
later than June 30, 2025.
The case stemmed from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by
the PHMPT, which sought comprehensive data related to the
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDA initially claimed it would need up to 75 years to process and
release the requested documents. However, the Court, presided over by
Judge Mark Pittman, rejected this argument, citing the importance of
government accountability.
In late 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) faced
significant public scrutiny after proposing a timeline that would extend
the full release of documents related to the approval of
Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine over several decades.
Trump was Right: Study Shows Countless Lives Could Have Been Saved with Hydroxychloroquine
This proposal emerged following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
request by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
(PHMPT), a group of scientists and public health professionals seeking
comprehensive data on the vaccine’s approval process.
The FDA initially suggested releasing 500 pages per month from a
collection exceeding 300,000 pages, effectively delaying complete
disclosure until around 2097. The agency cited limited staffing and the
extensive volume of documents as reasons for this prolonged timeline.
In response to the backlash, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort
Worth, Texas, issued a ruling in January 2022 that significantly
shortened the FDA’s proposed timeline.
Judge Pittman ordered the agency to release 55,000 pages per month, ensuring that all documents would be made public by the end of September 2022.
U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman mandated the FDA to
expedite the release of documents related to the Pfizer-BioNTech
COVID-19 vaccine.
According to his conclusion reviewed by The Gateway Pundit:
“The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be,
secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from
them.” Jonathan
Elliot, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of
the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at
Philadelphia in 1787, at 169–70 (ed. 1881) (statement of Patrick Henry).
The Covid-19 pandemic is long passed and so has any legitimate reason
for concealing from the American people the information relied upon by
the government in approving the Pfizer Vaccine.”
In his ruling, Judge Pittman ordered the FDA to produce the
“emergency use authorization” file, underscoring that with the
pandemic’s conclusion, there is no longer a valid reason to withhold the
information.
The FDA has already produced over a million pages of documents in
response to the lawsuit. However, the plaintiffs argue that the agency
continues to withhold critical information.
Aaron Siri, representing the plaintiffs, stated, “The FDA clearly
lacks confidence in the review that it conducted to license Pfizer’s
COVID-19 vaccine because it is doing everything possible to prevent
independent scientists from conducting an independent review.”
He continued, “The FDA was hiding from the court and the plaintiff
one million pages of clinical trial documents from the COVID-19 vaccine
clinical trials.”
Woke BLM Muslim Democrat and Former Illegal Migrant on Boston City Council Arrested by FBI for Corruption – Updated
by Jim Hᴏft745 CommentsTania Fernandes Anderson to the Boston City Council on August 31, 2022.
Boston City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson, a Democrat and the
first Muslim elected to the council, was arrested on Friday by FBI
agents.
Tania Fernandes Anderson, who served as Vice Chair of the Post Audit
Committee, which oversees government accountability, was arrested on six
felony charges (five counts of wire fraud and one count of theft
concerning programs receiving federal funds) stemming from a kickback
scheme.
“The charges stem from an alleged kickback scheme she orchestrated to
obtain several thousand dollars in taxpayer money in exchange for
bribes paid,” U.S. Attorney Joshua Levy said at Friday’s press
conference, according to NBC Boston.
According to the indictment, Fernandes Anderson allegedly awarded a
$13,000 bonus to a staffer, identified as “Staff Member A,” who is also a
relative, on the condition that the staffer return a significant
portion of the bonus—approximately $7,000—directly to her.
Anderson allegedly finalized the cash transaction in a bathroom at
City Hall, receiving $7,000 in kickbacks from Staff Member A, as
detailed by text message evidence included in the indictment.
According to the indictment reviewed by The Gateway Pundit,
“On or about June 9, 2023, at approximately 4: 11 p.m., Staff Member A
texted FERNANDES ANDERSON, “Bathroom” to let FERNANDES ANDERSON know
that Staff Member A was waiting in the bathroom to hand the $7,000 in
cash to FERNANDES ANDERSON. Within seconds, FERNANDES ANDERSON texted
Staff Member A, “Ready,” to confirm that FERNANDES ANDERSON was ready to
accept the $7,000 cash kickback from Staff Member A. Shortly following
these texts, Staff Member A handed FERNANDES ANDERSON approximately
$7,000 in cash at a bathroom in City Hall.”
“When they met in that bathroom, Ms. Fernandes Anderson put $7,000 in
her pocket,” Levy added. “All of that money was funded by the taxpayers
of Boston.”
The federal indictment also alleges that Fernandes Anderson
misrepresented her relationship with a staff member and misused her
position to hire family members, violating city ethics rules.
Despite being fined $5,000 by the Massachusetts State Ethics
Commission earlier this year, Fernandes Anderson allegedly doubled down
on her fraudulent activities.
Prosecutors allege she leveraged her authority to manipulate City
Council payroll orders, enabling her relative to receive an outsized
bonus—more than double the combined bonuses of other staff members.
Watch Ms. Anderson’s meltdown back in August 2022:
Anderson previously lived in the U.S. as an illegal immigrant from Praia, Cape Verde, arriving at the age of 10.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported on Tania Fernandez Anderson.
Anderson proposed a Boston Hijab Day to honor Iranian Mahsa Amini who
was killed by the Iranian regime for not wearing a hijab. This woman
it truly reprehensible.
Unhinged Rep. Jasmine
Crockett Goes on Another Anti-White Rant – Blasts Texas For Adding ‘Two
New White Seats’ to Congress (VIDEO)
by Ben Kew0 CommentsJasmine Crockett
Nothing makes Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett angrier than white people.
During a Congressional hearing on Thursday, Crockett went on a
prolonged anti-white rant during which she complained that despite the
state of Texas adding four million people, both those districts had been
won by Republicans.
Here is a transcript of the exchange:
CROCKETT: We were talking about how many
voters. Listen, when you’re counting people, you’re not just counting
voters. You count children, don’t you?
WITNESS: Correct.
CROCKETT: You count a lot of people that aren’t
necessarily voters. And I want to make sure that we really get to the
nitty-gritty on Texas, because this is hilarious to me.
Texas added two seats in 2020, according to the census, and we know
that there was a significant undercount, specifically in Texas, for a
combination of reasons.
But we know that specifically Texas added 4 million people. Of those 4
million people, do you want to take a guess at how many were Anglos?
Just a guess.
WITNESS: I’d say a majority.
CROCKETT: 180,000. That’s it, of 4 million. 95% of
the people that were added, and we know that when it comes to minority
populations, they tend to be undercounted.
So get this. We added 4 million people. They were people of color.
Texas got two new seats. So they took those black and brown and Asian
bodies, and guess what? Do you think that we got a new black, brown, or
Asian seat?
Somehow, the way that they do their Republican math in the state of Texas, that amounted to two new white seats.
Guess what? White Republican seats. We got two new Republican seats
out of 4 million people of color. So let me tell you, they love to use
our bodies to apportion us in an inaccurate way.
Watch the clip below:
Crockett is notorious for her embarrassing outbursts.
Just last month, she went on another rant
about how Republicans were attempting to dismantle DEI initiatives and
appeared to include herself among all the other black people who had
been oppressed in times of slavery.
Back in October, she also argued that America needs illegal aliens
pouring through the border in order to have people to pick the crops.
