BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
They just teach the NEXT generation how to collect and how to get free holiday meals (turkeys/hams etc). How to get free school supplies and backpacks. Free meals at school etc.
( I blogged about hearing ladies discussing WHICH place they were going to FIRST for free items.)
I guess so they can use the MONTHLY free money checks on their hair nails and what they need.
I have seen Many many many times people sell their food stamps for a reduced amount so they would have cash. I saw them sell their food boxes for cash.
GENERATIONS are collecting !!
They don't get married because the money stops.
Keep having kids so they collect the CHILD CREDIT.
Their lives are PAID for by the tax payers.
(Suburbs of Detroit)
We are so glad to get away from there. The suburbs of Detroit and filling up daily with the people that don't speak English. My friends tell me that their subdivisions are filling up with 2-3 families living in the houses. They come out at night. Work for cash money only as so called "handyman, or yard work" and the women clean houses for cash.
Those are very nice neighborhoods.
(So glad our whole family is gone from there. We all love the land/trees/privacy/and the lake)
IMPORTANT UPDATE--- BUT READ ALL OF IT BECAUSE THE TITLEDOES NOT MEAN WHAT YOU THINK IT DOES
Hilton Corporate Takes
‘Immediate Action’ Against Hotel that Barred Heroic DHS and ICE Agents
After Journalist Nick Sortor Catches the Offending Hotel in a MASSIVE
Lie
by Cullen Linebarger440 Comment
Hilton Hotels Worldwide in Tysons Corner, Fairfax County, Virginia. Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Hilton Corporate has finally taken action against the despicable
‘independent’ Hilton hotel in Minneapolis that banned ICE and DHS
agents, thanks to the dogged efforts of independent conservative
journalist Nick Sortor.
As The Gateway Pundit reported,
the Department of Homeland Security’s X account shared a disturbing
email on Monday showing that Hilton Hotels had abruptly cancelled
reservations for DHS officers in Minneapolis for daring to round up
dangerous illegal aliens.
The specific Hilton hotel in question is the Hampton Inn Lakeville property.
“After further investigation online, we have found information about
immigration work connected to your name, and we will be canceling your
reservation,” the email read.
In another email, the hotel warned patrons that “if you are DHS or
immigration, please let us know, as we will have to cancel your
reservation.”
After the DHS rightfully expressed its outrage, Hilton Corporate announced in a statement that it would investigate the matter.
Hilton Corporate later released a statement saying they had been in
touch with the hotel’s independent ownership, Everpeak, who apologized
and assured them the situation had been rectified. DHS agents would
supposedly be allowed to return to the establishment.
But Sortor went to the hotel Monday night and quickly discovered that the statement was an outright lie.
The journalist went to the front desk and asked the front desk to
book some rooms for DHS agents. He had previously conducted research and
knew that there were 10 rooms available.
But the front desk clerk informed Sortor that the anti-immigration
law enforcement order remained in effect, contrary to management’s
previous statement. He made it clear that he had just spoken to the
owner, who confirmed that no changes had been made.
WATCH:
Following the release of Sortor’s video, Hilton released a statement
calling out the owner for lying and announced they were taking
“immediate action” to remove the hotel from their systems.
From Hilton:
The independent hotel owner had assured us that they had
fixed the problem and published a message confirming this. A recent
video clearly raises concerns that they are not meeting our standards
and values.
As such, we are taking immediate action to remove this hotel from our
systems. Hilton is and has always been and remains a welcoming place
for all.
NY Times Op-Ed Writer’s Bigoted Anti-White Tirade: “The Mistake That You Made is You Let Us In In the First Place(Video)
by Margaret Flavin147 Comments
Wajahat Ali/ Video screenshot @officer_Lew/X
Wajahat Ali, an op-ed writer for The New York Times and columnist for
The Daily Beast, recently unleashed a bigoted anti-white tirade on
social media.
Ali, a Pakistani-descent Muslim whose parents came to the U.S. in
1965, seems unappreciative of his opportunity to live the American
dream. Instead, he sees his family’s entry into the United States as
proof that White Americans’ days are numbered.
In a video shared on social media, Ali said, “You have lost. You lost.”
“The mistake that you made is you let us in in the first place.”
“That’s the thing with brown people. I’m going to say this as a brown
person, there’s a lot of us. Like a lot. There’s like 1. 2 billion in
India. There’s more than 200 million in Pakistan, there’s like 170
million in Bangladesh. Those are just the people there. I’m not even
talking about the folks who are expats or immigrants.”
“There’s a bunch of us, and we breed. We’re a breeding people. And
the problem is you let us in in 1965. There were a few of us beforehand.
But once you let one of us in, you know what happens with brown folks?
Our grandmother comes, our grandfather comes, our uncle comes, our aunt
comes, our cousin comes, our second cousin comes, our third cousin
comes. Then we have kids, a bunch of kids.”
“And then guess what? Some white women, the Western civilization
women, the pure women, the American women, ‘the Rust Belt’ women, the
real women, they like some of us brown folks. We don’t take them. They
come to us.”
“We’re embedded. We are everywhere. We are everywhere.”
“I’ve traveled this country. I’m going to speak as a brown person.
Brown people are everywhere. There will be a Patel Motel or there will
be a Desi restaurant everywhere.”
“I want you to realize this: You have lost.”
“Your story is a shi**y story filled with misery.”
“It’s filled with bland chicken. It’s filled with terrible, terrible dry ass meat.”
“Your music sucks. All your culture sucks. Nobody, that’s why the
kids listen to Black people and their music. That’s why the kids love
Latinos.”
“Your parties suck because they’re monochromatic. Our parties have better food, better music, better-looking w”omen.
Ali’s parents were arrested and convicted following Operation
Cyberstorm, a two-year undercover operation by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) against illegal copying of software.
In 2007, the Justice Department announced that the defendants
operated a scheme to obtain over $29 million worth of discounted
software under false pretenses.
Per the Department of Justice in 2007:
United States Attorney Scott N. Schools announced that
defendants Mirza Ali and Sameena Ali, husband and wife, and defendants
Keith Griffen and William Glushenko, were sentenced yesterday for their
role in devising a scheme to defraud Microsoft Corporation by obtaining
discounted software under false pretenses. The scheme involved
purchasing more than $29 million worth of software that was steeply
discounted for academic institutions, and selling it to non-academic
entities, in violation of the Microsoft agreement.
United States District Court Judge, Claudia Wilken sentenced Mirza
Ali, 60, of Fremont and Sameena Ali, 53, also of Fremont, to 60 months
imprisonment, forfeiture in the amount of $5,105,977, restitution to
Microsoft Corporation in the amount of $20,000,000, 3 years of
supervised release, and $3,000 in special assessments. Keith Griffen,
56, of Oregon City, Oregon, was sentenced to 33 months of imprisonment,
restitution to Microsoft Corporation in the amount of $20,000,000, 3
years of supervised release, and $900 in special assessments. William
Glushenko, 66, was sentenced to 1 year probation and 100 hours of
community service after pleading guilty to misprision of a felony.
The Alis, former owners of Samtech Research Inc., were convicted on
November 28, 2006, of 30 counts of conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud,
and money laundering. Mr. Griffen, was convicted of nine counts of
conspiracy, mail fraud, and wire fraud.
According to the evidence presented in a stipulated bench trial, from
January 1997 through January 2001, the Alis and Mr. Griffen formed
several nominee corporations and purchased existing corporations holding
Microsoft licensing agreements for the purpose of participating in
Microsoft’s Authorized Education Reseller (AER) program, a program that
provides Microsoft software at steeply discounted prices for resale to
academic institutions only.
In 1996, after the Alis were audited by Microsoft and removed from
the AER program for failure to comply with its terms, the Alis formed
new corporations in the names of others to disguise their identity from
Microsoft and reenter the AER program.
In 1999, when Microsoft stopped accepting AER applications from new
corporations, the Alis and Mr. Griffen, in the names of others, bought
small companies throughout the United States that held Microsoft AER
licensing agreements and thereafter continued to purchase academic
software products.
Using these nominee entities, the Alis and their co-conspirators
purchased more than $29 million worth of AER software from Microsoft and
sold this software to non-academic entities, in violation of the
Microsoft agreement, for a profit of more than $5 million.
The Alis were also convicted of laundering the proceeds of this
scheme, including purchasing real property in the name of their college
age son and wiring more than $300,000 of the proceeds from the illegal
sales of the Microsoft educational software to Pakistan.
(while we work two or three jobs to MAKE ENDS MEET... she sits and collects. We have NEVER gotten a single penny from the government. NO food stamps no welfare.... NOTHING. We WORKED for what we got every month.)
New Mexico News Station
Tries to Garner Sympathy for Food Stamp Recipients by Featuring Woman
Who’s Been on SNAP for Three Decades (VIDEO)
by Mike LaChance443 Comments
This woman has been on SNAP for three decades – Screencap of Twitter/X video.
One of the ways that the government shutdown has backfired on
Democrats, is that it has awakened the public to widespread abuse of the
food stamp program SNAP, and it has shown how many Americans are on the
program.
The numbers are staggering.
In New Mexico, one news station tried to run a piece that would make
SNAP recipients look sympathetic. They interviewed a woman who has been
on SNAP benefits for more than thirty years.
Is this supposed to make the public feel bad? How many more people
out there have been on SNAP benefits for this long? Is this what was
intended when the program was created? A lifetime of free food on the
taxpayers’ dime?
From the Pinon Post:
For Maggie Aragon, a New Mexico woman who’s relied on
federal food assistance for more than 30 years, the moment her SNAP
balance dropped to zero was life-altering, she says.
“When I heard, ‘Zero dollars,’ my chest went into my throat,” Aragon
told KOAT 7 News, describing the fear and panic that set in when she
discovered her benefits had been cut off due to the ongoing Democrat-led
government shutdown. “It’s detrimental to my life.”
Aragon, who said she also depends on local food banks to survive, is
one of tens of thousands of New Mexicans now facing uncertainty as the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) runs out of funding.
However, it shows the cracks in what is supposed to be a temporary
system, letting people live off of SNAP for not just years, but decades.
With New Mexico having the highest percentage of SNAP recipients in the
nation, the effects of the shutdown are being felt most sharply here,
making it a wake-up call…
Revelations of widespread fraud and abuse in the SNAP program have
further inflamed the situation. In a stunning admission this week, U.S.
Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins called for a complete overhaul
of the EBT system following the exposure of massive corruption.
Benefits like food stamps are supposed to be part of social safety net, a temporary fix, not the foundation of a lifestyle.
This type of situation is likely far more common than most people realize.
