BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
On Monday news broke that Dominion Voting Systems threatened My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell with a letter dated
December 23, 2020, from defamation lawyers. In the letter, Dominion
lawyer Thomas A. Clare called Lindell’s attacks on the voting company
used in all six contested states “implausible,” adding they have “no
basis in reality.”
100 Percent Fed Up
later reported – Mike Lindell is not the only person who received a
threatening letter from Dominion—at least one GOP poll challenger in
Michigan (who never even mentioned Dominion in her affidavit) received a
threatening letter from Dominion.
Mike Lindell, a devout Christian, is not worried about a letter from
Dominion lawyers threatening defamation. Like President Trump, Lindell
is a fighter and is vowing to fight back, telling Axios that
he’s looking forward to Dominion’s lawsuit. “I want Dominion to put up
their lawsuit because we have 100% evidence that China and other
countries used their machines to steal the election.”
Also on Monday Bed, Bath and Beyond issued a statement saying
the company will no longer sell “My Pillow” products after Mike Lindell
challenged the election results.
You are no longer allowed to question election fraud in the United States of America.
Later last night Mike Lindell told OANN that Kohl’s and Bed, Bath and Beyond will no longer sell his products.
Lindell also told the RSBN reporter that Bed Bath and Beyond, Costco
and Kohls have just dropped sales for his products in their stores over
his support for voter fraud to be revealed.
The New York Times recently outlined
the inner workings of a secret deal between Facebook and Google that
allowed the companies to jointly dominate the online advertising market.
In an article titled “Behind a Secret Deal Between Google and Facebook,” the New York Times
outlines a secret deal between Facebook and Google related to the
online advertising market that the two companies largely dominate.
Facebook revealed in 2017 that it was testing a new way of selling
ads online that could threaten Google’s control of the online
advertising market, but just two years later Facebook announced that it
would be joining an alliance of companies backing a similar effort by
Google, seemingly abandoning its own plans that would have allowed the
company to better compete with Google.
Facebook never clarified why it seemed to abandon its own project,
but an antitrust lawsuit filed by ten state attorneys general last month
implies that Google had extended to Facebook a sweetheart deal to be a
partner.
Executives at six of the partners in the alliance told the NYT
that their agreements with Google did not contain many of the generous
benefits that Facebook received and that Google had given Facebook a
significant advantage over the other partners in the alliance.
The deal between Google and Facebook was reportedly code-named “Jedi
Blue” and pertains to a segment of the online advertising market called
programmatic advertising. A new advertising method called header bidding
emerged as part of a workaround to reduce reliance on Google’s ad
platforms.
The NYT explains:
In the milliseconds between a user
clicking on a link to a web page and the page’s ads loading, bids for
available ad space are placed behind the scenes in marketplaces known as
exchanges, with the winning bid passed to an ad server. Because
Google’s ad exchange and ad server were both dominant, it often directed
the business to its own exchange.
Header bidding provided a workaround that
allowed news outlets and other sites to solicit bids from multiple
exchanges at once, increasing competition and leading to better prices
for publishers. In an attempt to prevent significant losses from the new
method, Google developed an alternative called Open Bidding that
allowed other exchanges to simultaneously compete alongside Google.
Google would then receive a fee for every winning bid.
The NYT writes:
The threat of Facebook, one of the
biggest ad buyers on the internet, supporting header bidding was a grave
concern at Google. The draft of the complaint reviewed by The Times
cited an email from a Google executive calling it an “existential
threat” that required “an all hands on deck approach.”
Facebook announced in March 2017 that
it was testing header bidding with publishers like The Washington Post,
Forbes and The Daily Mail. Facebook also took a jab at Google, saying
the digital ad industry had been handing over profits to “third-party
middlemen who make the rules and obfuscate the truth.”
Before Google and Facebook signed the
deal in Sept. 2018, Facebook executives outlined the company’s options
to Mark Zuckerberg, its chief executive, according to the draft of the
complaint: hire hundreds more engineers and spend billions of dollars to
compete against Google; exit the business; or do the deal.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolanor contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com
Donald Trump might already be ineligible to serve as president of
the United States in the future. That’s true even without an
impeachment process that ends with a formal ban from future public
office
The
relevant constitutional provision is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,
enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War and mentioned in the article
of impeachment proposed before the House this week. The provision bars a
person from holding any office “under the United States” if the person
has sworn an oath of allegiance to the Constitution and then “engaged in
insurrection or rebellion” against the government or “given aid to the
enemies” of the U.S.
Does this provision to apply to Trump? The first part
certainly does: Trump took an oath to uphold the Constitution when he
became president.
Twice-failed presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton spread insane
conspiracy theories on Monday suggesting President Trump called Vladimir
Putin on the same day protesters stormed the Capitol.
Protesters stormed the US Capitol on January 6 in a preplanned
attack, however the Democrat-media complex continues to blame Trump for
‘inciting a riot.’
Hillary Clinton suggested that President Trump conspired with
Vladimir Putin during the Capitol Riot in a podcast interview with
Speaker Pelosi.
“I would love to see his phone records, to see whether he was talking
to Putin the day that the insurgents invaded our capitol,” sore loser
Hillary Clinton said to Pelosi. “But we all know that not just him, but
his enablers, his accomplices, his cult members, have the same disregard
for democracy.”
She continued, “Do you think we need a 9/11 type commission to
investigate and report everything that they can pull together and
explain what happened?”
“I do,” Pelosi said. “To your point who is he beholden to — as I’ve
said over and over…as I pointed to him, with you Mr. President, all
roads lead to Putin.”
“I don’t know what Putin has on him politically, financially, or
personally, but what happened last week was a gift to Putin because
Putin wants to undermine democracy in our country and throughout the
world. And these people, unbeknownst to them, are Putin puppets. They
were doing Putin’s business when they did that…” Pelosi said.
Democrat Ritchie Torres
(D-NY) pushed new legislation to encircle the US Capitol with a fence
and secure barricade to protect lawmakers from the people.
Torres told reporters, “We have to ensure the Capitol is secure during a time of sedition.”
For years Democrats in Congress insisted walls don’t work. But they
sure are quick to change their mind when they fear for their own
protection.
In 2019 Democrats sued President Trump in order to block his border wall project. They fought it every step of the way.
Obviously, their security is more important than the security of the American people.
President Trump banned hateful and divisive critical race theory from
federal agencies and Joe Biden, a lifelong racist, is bringing it back.
Joe Biden on Monday nominated San Diego Unified School District
Superintendent Cindy Marten to serve as his administration’s Deputy
Secretary of Education.
Cindy Marten is a far left radical who promoted dangerous ‘critical race theory’ in San Diego public schools.
According to whistleblower documents obtained by investigative
reporter Christopher Rufo, Marten promoted the concept that schools
“spirit murder” black children and that white teachers should undergo
“antiracist therapy.”
San Diego Unified School District tells white teachers they are
guilty of “spirit murdering” black children and should undergo
“antiracist therapy for White educators.”
This summer, San Diego Unified hired critical race theorist Bettina
Love for a district-wide training on “[challenging] the oppressive
practices that live within … school organizations.” The district forbade
recordings, but my whistleblower took screenshots and detailed notes.
According to the whistleblower notes, Love began by saying that
“racism runs deep” in America and that blacks alone “know who America
really is.” Love claimed that public schools “don’t see [blacks] as
human,” perpetuate “anti-Blackness,” and “spirit murder babies.”
The concept of “spirit murder” is at the heart of Love’s teachings.
Love writes that public schools are guilty of “the spirit murdering of
Black and Brown children,” defines as “a death that is built on racism
and intended to reduce, humiliate, and destroy people of color.”
