BEWARE...SOME DAYS ARE NOT VERY PRETTY. I GET CRABBY LIKE NORMAL PEOPLE DO. AND I DO SPEAK MY MIND.
DO NOT READ IF YOU ARE SENSITIVE TO TRUE, REAL, EVERYDAY FEELINGS LIKE MINE.(But I think you would enjoy it)
DON'T FORGET...FREEDOM OF SPEECH !
This post was updated after former Trump official said the request came from Nancy Pelosi and not Mayor Bowser
Democrats are preparing the US Capitol for the inauguration of Joe Biden this week.
Already the statement they and their allies are making to the American
people is that “we fear you” and “we will crush any dissent.”
In the days leading up to the Biden inaugural, the nation’s
capital has been turned into an occupied military zone like Baghdad. In
fact, there are more US troops in the nation’s capital today than in
Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan combined.
Armed US troops authorized to use lethal force are manning checkpoints to enter and leave downtown Washington, D.C. Green Zone and Red Zone perimeters have been established.
And according to former Deputy of Homeland Security Ken
Cuccinelli told Newsmax TV that Nancy Pelosi called for crew-served
automatic weapons on light armored vehicles be included in the National
Guard’s arsenal to mow down any people who may storm the US Capitol on
Inauguration Day.
.@KenCuccinelli says DC @MayorBowser
requested crew-served machine guns be included in the National Guard’s
arsenal to protect the capital. Cuccinelli says she was told no – that
weapons like that have no place in securing a civilian event.
Armed LGBT and BLM Activists Show Up For “Armed
Violent Protests” at MI Capitol After Left-Wing Media Warned About
“Militias, Right-Wing Activists, White Supremacists” Descending On
Capitol
On Sunday, January 17th, 2021, armed protesters began assembling at Michigan’s capitol building in Lansing.
Armed Protesters at Michigan’s Capitol Building in Lansing, wearing masks, BLM, and LGBTQ gear
In an unprecedented fashion, federal armed troops have been
amassing in Capitol cities by the thousands around the country in
preparation for the 2021 presidential inauguration. Such oppressive
militant behavior is generally indicative of dictators in third-world
countries who were not elected lawfully and who fear retaliation from
their oppressed countrymen. It is a show of complete dominance over a
helpless people who have no Constitutional rights.
One such display is taking place in at the Michigan State
Capitol Building in Lansing. It is being met with a small band of
protesters who have begun to amass.
In a video by BGOnTheScene, a leader of the small group who is
wearing an LGBTQ flag delivers a very brief statement while holding a
rifle outside a make-shift fence surrounding the state Capitol as a
precaution for the Biden inauguration on January 20th. He is standing
next to what appears to be a Black Lives Matter protester in a BLM
hoodie. All of the protesters, except the speaker, are masked to hide
their identities, much like BLM/Antifa would do. Given all of these
facts, it is difficult to believe that most or all of the people taking
part in this protest are conservatives or Trump supporters.
In fact, we have reached out to all of our right-wing contacts in Michigan. All
our sources on the right insist that they want to have nothing to do
with any protests surrounding the inauguration because they believe them
to be false flag events designed to trick Trump supporters and
conservatives.
In his brief statement, the speaker in the group who refuses to give
his name or organization begins by stating that “We come in peace. We do
not intend to commit violence”
“If you continue to oppress the American people,
they will remain rational no longer.” A member of the Boogaloo Bois
gives remarks outside the fenced-off Capitol steps #Lansing#Michigan#Capitolpic.twitter.com/Jo9Xxdhpdx
However, he does offer a somewhat ominous warning:
“If you continue to oppress the American people, they will remain rational no longer”
He finishes by saying that “We can do this together…I don’t want
Americans fighting Americans…and I don’t want the government to laugh
all the way to the bank while they do it”
We encourage our readers to avoid any protests surrounding
the election in the coming few weeks. There are several indications that
anti-Trump conspirators are attempting to ensnare well-meaning
conservatives and Trump-Supporters in false flag events, much like what
happened at the capitol building on January 6th.
Dissent is not allowed. You can no longer question the results.
Twitter handed The Gateway Pundit account a 12-hour suspension for
questioning the stolen election. Then upped it to a six-day
suspension. This was doled out in the middle of the night. Someone on
the late shift was targeting us.
Last week Twitter banned a tweet questioning fraud in the election.
On Monday news broke that Dominion Voting Systems threatened My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell with a letter dated
December 23, 2020, from defamation lawyers. In the letter, Dominion
lawyer Thomas A. Clare called Lindell’s attacks on the voting company
used in all six contested states “implausible,” adding they have “no
basis in reality.”
100 Percent Fed Up
later reported – Mike Lindell is not the only person who received a
threatening letter from Dominion—at least one GOP poll challenger in
Michigan (who never even mentioned Dominion in her affidavit) received a
threatening letter from Dominion.
Mike Lindell, a devout Christian, is not worried about a letter from
Dominion lawyers threatening defamation. Like President Trump, Lindell
is a fighter and is vowing to fight back, telling Axios that
he’s looking forward to Dominion’s lawsuit. “I want Dominion to put up
their lawsuit because we have 100% evidence that China and other
countries used their machines to steal the election.”
Also on Monday Bed, Bath and Beyond issued a statement saying
the company will no longer sell “My Pillow” products after Mike Lindell
challenged the election results.
You are no longer allowed to question election fraud in the United States of America.
Later last night Mike Lindell told OANN that Kohl’s and Bed, Bath and Beyond will no longer sell his products.
Lindell also told the RSBN reporter that Bed Bath and Beyond, Costco
and Kohls have just dropped sales for his products in their stores over
his support for voter fraud to be revealed.
The New York Times recently outlined
the inner workings of a secret deal between Facebook and Google that
allowed the companies to jointly dominate the online advertising market.
In an article titled “Behind a Secret Deal Between Google and Facebook,” the New York Times
outlines a secret deal between Facebook and Google related to the
online advertising market that the two companies largely dominate.
Facebook revealed in 2017 that it was testing a new way of selling
ads online that could threaten Google’s control of the online
advertising market, but just two years later Facebook announced that it
would be joining an alliance of companies backing a similar effort by
Google, seemingly abandoning its own plans that would have allowed the
company to better compete with Google.
Facebook never clarified why it seemed to abandon its own project,
but an antitrust lawsuit filed by ten state attorneys general last month
implies that Google had extended to Facebook a sweetheart deal to be a
partner.
Executives at six of the partners in the alliance told the NYT
that their agreements with Google did not contain many of the generous
benefits that Facebook received and that Google had given Facebook a
significant advantage over the other partners in the alliance.
The deal between Google and Facebook was reportedly code-named “Jedi
Blue” and pertains to a segment of the online advertising market called
programmatic advertising. A new advertising method called header bidding
emerged as part of a workaround to reduce reliance on Google’s ad
platforms.
The NYT explains:
In the milliseconds between a user
clicking on a link to a web page and the page’s ads loading, bids for
available ad space are placed behind the scenes in marketplaces known as
exchanges, with the winning bid passed to an ad server. Because
Google’s ad exchange and ad server were both dominant, it often directed
the business to its own exchange.
Header bidding provided a workaround that
allowed news outlets and other sites to solicit bids from multiple
exchanges at once, increasing competition and leading to better prices
for publishers. In an attempt to prevent significant losses from the new
method, Google developed an alternative called Open Bidding that
allowed other exchanges to simultaneously compete alongside Google.
Google would then receive a fee for every winning bid.
The NYT writes:
The threat of Facebook, one of the
biggest ad buyers on the internet, supporting header bidding was a grave
concern at Google. The draft of the complaint reviewed by The Times
cited an email from a Google executive calling it an “existential
threat” that required “an all hands on deck approach.”
Facebook announced in March 2017 that
it was testing header bidding with publishers like The Washington Post,
Forbes and The Daily Mail. Facebook also took a jab at Google, saying
the digital ad industry had been handing over profits to “third-party
middlemen who make the rules and obfuscate the truth.”
Before Google and Facebook signed the
deal in Sept. 2018, Facebook executives outlined the company’s options
to Mark Zuckerberg, its chief executive, according to the draft of the
complaint: hire hundreds more engineers and spend billions of dollars to
compete against Google; exit the business; or do the deal.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolanor contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com
Donald Trump might already be ineligible to serve as president of
the United States in the future. That’s true even without an
impeachment process that ends with a formal ban from future public
office
The
relevant constitutional provision is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,
enacted in the aftermath of the Civil War and mentioned in the article
of impeachment proposed before the House this week. The provision bars a
person from holding any office “under the United States” if the person
has sworn an oath of allegiance to the Constitution and then “engaged in
insurrection or rebellion” against the government or “given aid to the
enemies” of the U.S.
Does this provision to apply to Trump? The first part
certainly does: Trump took an oath to uphold the Constitution when he
became president.
Democrats are preparing the US Capitol for the inauguration of Joe Biden this week.
