Hey... this is what he wanted or he wouldn't have done it.
But he won't be able to get his eyebrows done anymore. He will have to shave them like other INMATES.
No paying the big bucks for all the procedures to make yourself so PRETTY.
Mark my words... he will come out soon. 12-10-24
(Or get a million proposals from ALL)
To the NORMAL person..... this guy is a worm. He thinks he is so smart but look where he is.
DumbA$$
..
I thought it was exaggerated but NO... she is a mess.
Finally they are understanding that THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN and we don't want their CRAZY NONSENSE in our country any longer.
Go have another Kam Kam. (Yes I know, but it bothers her so I'm writing it).
...
I woke up with so much information about this guy and yet we are still waiting for information on other incidents/shootings/killings etc.
Does anyone remember the trans school shooter? And most was only showed redacted text (blacked out). And they released it how long after the shooting?????
Isn't anyone asking WHY they would release so much info over night?
Something is NOT right.
..
Oh and get a freaking job instead of asking people for their HARD EARNED MONEY.
EARN your own !!!!!
..
Those people look so stupid wearing them.
I mean they look ridiculous.
..
You KNOW she has things to hide right?
Everyone has skeletons.
Hmmm and what about judges that take the law into their own hands?
What about FANI ?
...
(Click on the link above for more TRUE stories that they don't want you to see)
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a high-profile case brought by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).
The decision mandates the FDA to release the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) file for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine no later than June 30, 2025.
The case stemmed from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by the PHMPT, which sought comprehensive data related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDA initially claimed it would need up to 75 years to process and release the requested documents. However, the Court, presided over by Judge Mark Pittman, rejected this argument, citing the importance of government accountability.
In late 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) faced significant public scrutiny after proposing a timeline that would extend the full release of documents related to the approval of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine over several decades.
Trump was Right: Study Shows Countless Lives Could Have Been Saved with Hydroxychloroquine
This proposal emerged following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), a group of scientists and public health professionals seeking comprehensive data on the vaccine’s approval process.
The FDA initially suggested releasing 500 pages per month from a collection exceeding 300,000 pages, effectively delaying complete disclosure until around 2097. The agency cited limited staffing and the extensive volume of documents as reasons for this prolonged timeline.
In response to the backlash, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, Texas, issued a ruling in January 2022 that significantly shortened the FDA’s proposed timeline.
Judge Pittman ordered the agency to release 55,000 pages per month, ensuring that all documents would be made public by the end of September 2022.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman mandated the FDA to expedite the release of documents related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
According to his conclusion reviewed by The Gateway Pundit:
“The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.” Jonathan
Elliot, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787, at 169–70 (ed. 1881) (statement of Patrick Henry). The Covid-19 pandemic is long passed and so has any legitimate reason for concealing from the American people the information relied upon by the government in approving the Pfizer Vaccine.”
In his ruling, Judge Pittman ordered the FDA to produce the “emergency use authorization” file, underscoring that with the pandemic’s conclusion, there is no longer a valid reason to withhold the information.
The FDA has already produced over a million pages of documents in response to the lawsuit. However, the plaintiffs argue that the agency continues to withhold critical information.
Aaron Siri, representing the plaintiffs, stated, “The FDA clearly lacks confidence in the review that it conducted to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine because it is doing everything possible to prevent independent scientists from conducting an independent review.”
He continued, “The FDA was hiding from the court and the plaintiff one million pages of clinical trial documents from the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.”
